[2023] KEELC 18388 (KLR)
The court held that, pursuant to Order 24 Rule 4(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, an application for substitution of a deceased defendant must be made within one year of death, failing which the suit abates by operation of law. In this case, the 1st defendant died on 4 January 2022, and no application for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 18388 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Charles Ratemo Nyambati (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Samson Nyambati Nyamweya); Defendant: Jackton Ocharo; Defendant: Charles Ratemo Nyamweya; Defendant: Alice Kerubo Nyambati; Defendant: Kefa Nami Nyangito; Defendant: Land Registrar, Kisii County; Defendant: Attorney General; Defendant: Alice Kwamboka Nami; Defendant: Vincent Ogembo Nami
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 10 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Abatement Due to Death of 1st Defendant
- Outcome
- Suit against the 1st defendant abated for want of substitution within one year of death; no order as to costs; further directions reserved.
- Judges
- M Sila
- Legal Topics
- Abatement of Suit, Substitution of Parties, Death of Defendant, Procedure on Death, Estate Administration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Ratemo Nyambati (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Samson Nyambati Nyamweya)
Plaintiff
Jackton Ocharo
Defendant
Charles Ratemo Nyamweya
Defendant
Alice Kerubo Nyambati
Defendant
Kefa Nami Nyangito
Defendant
Land Registrar, Kisii County
Defendant
Attorney General
Defendant
Alice Kwamboka Nami
Defendant
Vincent Ogembo Nami
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Abatement Due to Death of 1st Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit against the 1st defendant should abate due to failure to substitute within one year of death.
- 2 Whether any further proceedings can be maintained against the deceased 1st defendant.
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded upon abatement of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, pursuant to Order 24 Rule 4(3) of the Civil Procedure Rules, an application for substitution of a deceased defendant must be made within one year of death, failing which the suit abates by operation of law. In this case, the 1st defendant died on 4 January 2022, and no application for substitution was made within the required period. Consequently, the suit against the 1st defendant abated automatically. The court further exercised its discretion not to award costs for or against the estate of the deceased 1st defendant. The court deferred any determination on the substance of the remaining suit pending further submissions from counsel.
Court Disposition
Suit against the 1st defendant abated for want of substitution within one year of death; no order as to costs; further directions reserved.
Orders
- The suit against the 1st defendant is marked as abated.
- No orders as to costs for or against the estate of the 1st defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
Nyambati (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Samson Nyambati Nyamweya) v Ocharo & 7 others (Environment & Land Case 10 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 18388 (KLR) (21 June 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 18388 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kisii
Environment & Land Case 10 of 2021
M Sila, J
June 21, 2023
Between
Charles Ratemo Nyambati (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Samson Nyambati Nyamweya)
Plaintiff
and
Jackton Ocharo
1st Defendant
Charles Ratemo Nyamweya
2nd Defendant
Alice Kerubo Nyambati
3rd Defendant
Kefa Nami Nyangito
4th Defendant
Land Registrar, Kisii County
5th Defendant
Attorney General
6th Defendant
Alice Kwamboka Nami
7th Defendant
Vincent Ogembo Nami
8th Defendant
Ruling
1. I need to give a ruling and/or directions in this matter given that the 1st defendant is deceased. It is said that he died on 4 January 2022. So far, no substitution has been done, though Dr Kamau Kuria, learned counsel for the plaintiff, did state from the bar that there is a pending succession matter before the High Court at Kisii, being Kisii High Court Succession Cause No E002 of 2022 where his client has tried to have a legal representative appointed on behalf of the estate of the 1st defendant so that he/she can continue this suit. There was also mention of succession case No 31 of 2016, but I am not quite sure how it can relate to the cause of a person who died on 4 January 2022. Whatever the case, the position is that so far, as given by counsel, is that there has been no grant yet in respect of the estate of the 1st defendant and no application for substitution has been made.Order 24 Rule 4 provides as follows :-"4. Procedure in case of death of one of several defendants or of sole defendant.(1)Where one of two or more defendants dies and the cause of action does not survive or continue against the surviving defendant or defendants alone, or a sole defendant or sole surviving defendant dies and the cause of action survives or continues, the court, on an application made in that behalf, shall cause the legal representative of the deceased defendant to be made a party and shall proceed with the suit.(2)Any person so made a party may make any defence appropriate to his character as legal representative of the deceased defendant.(3)Where within one year no application is made under subrule (1), the suit shall abate as against the deceased defendant."
2. It will be seen from the above, especially sub-rule (3), that an application for substitution of a deceased party needs to be made within one year of death or else the suit abates as against the deceased defendant. Abatement is by operation of law. In this instance, no application for substitution has been made within one year and it follows that the suit against the 1st defendant has abated. This court’s hands are tied and has no choice but to make the order that the suit against the 1st defendant has abated. The only issue left upon the abatement is costs and in this court’s discretion, I make no orders as to costs for or against the now deceased 1st defendant.
3. The other important issue, subsequent to the order above, is to determine whether or not there is any substance left in this suit now that it has abated against the 1st defendant. I think that before I make a decision on that, it is only prudent that I first give counsel leeway to address me on it. For the moment, as I have mentioned before, the case against the 1st defendant is marked abated and nothing can be pursued as against the 1st defendant within this suit.
4. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISII THIS 21 DAY OF JUNE 2023JUSTICE MUNYAO SILAJUDGE, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT KISII