[2005] KEHC 3055 (KLR)
The court held that while amendments to pleadings can generally be made at any stage, the introduction of a substantial claim for special damages—over KES 11 million—requires a formal application rather than an oral one. This is necessary to ensure procedural fairness, allow for the exchange of documents, and give...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 3055 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Nyamodi Ochieng Nyamogo; Defendant: Kenya Posts & Telecommunications Corporation
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 1736 of 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Oral Application to Amend Plaint
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend plaint orally rejected.
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Special Damages, Court Fees, Oral Vs Formal Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nyamodi Ochieng Nyamogo
Plaintiff
Kenya Posts & Telecommunications Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Oral Application to Amend Plaint
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff can orally apply for leave to amend the plaint to include a definite figure of special damages at the hearing stage.
- 2 Whether such an amendment introducing a substantial sum requires a formal application rather than an oral one.
- 3 Whether the defendant is prejudiced by the late introduction of a large claim for special damages.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while amendments to pleadings can generally be made at any stage, the introduction of a substantial claim for special damages—over KES 11 million—requires a formal application rather than an oral one. This is necessary to ensure procedural fairness, allow for the exchange of documents, and give the defendant sufficient time to seek further instructions and prepare a response. The court found that the oral application was inappropriate in the circumstances and rejected it, directing the plaintiff to file a formal application for leave to amend the pleadings.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend plaint orally rejected.
Orders
- The plaintiff's oral application for leave to amend the plaint is rejected.
- The plaintiff is directed to make a formal application for leave to amend the pleadings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 1736 of 1993
NYAMODI OCHIENG NYAMOGO………………….........................….PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
KENYA POSTS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION...DEFENDANT
RULING
This suit came up for hearing today but before it started Mr. Nyamogo, counsel for the plaintiff applied orally under Order VIA Rule 8 for leave to amend the plaint includes a definite figure of special damages of shs.11,803,249/= which was not included.
Mr. Kipkorir counsel for the defendant opposed the application and submitted that the power of the court to amend pleadings is donated by Order VIA of the Civil Procedure Rules. The rule provides that there shall be a formal application but in any event the court has power to hear an oral application. He submitted that the plaintiff has made 5 previous substantial amendments to the plaint and the amendment sought introduces a huge definite figure of Shs.11,803,249/=.
Secondly because the amount for special damages were specifically stated the filing fees was only Shs.6,000/= but with the definite figure included, the filing fees could have been over Shs.70,000/= which was not paid.
Thirdly he only had instructions from his client to defend the suit as it ……………….that the amendment is introducing a colossal figure of over Shs.11 million, he needs to have further instructions from his client.
In reply Mr. Nyamogo submitted that amendments to pleadings can be effected at any stage and his client is willing to pay the balance of the required court fees immediately. It is a legal requirement that special damages ought to be pleaded and proved. Only minor amendments are required to be sought orally before the start of the hearing but not when the plaintiff intends to introduce special damages to the tune of over Shs.11 million. This would require a formal application as the same would require exchange of documents necessary to prove special damages and the defence counsel will need time for consultation and further instructions.
For the above reasons, application for leave to amend pleadings orally is rejected. The plaintiff should make a formal application for leave to amend this pleadings.
Dated this 21st day of July 2005.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
JUDGE