[2022] KEHC 10983 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 10983 (KLR)

The court adopted the probation officer's recommendation against the applicant's release, finding no sufficient basis to alter the custodial sentence. The court further clarified that the sentences for the two counts should run concurrently, not consecutively, and directed the prison authorities to amend their...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 10983 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hesbon Ratemo Nyandika; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E032 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Application for revision of sentence dismissed; sentences to run concurrently; period in custody to be considered in sentence computation.
Judges
JN Kamau
Legal Topics
Sentencing Principles, Concurrent Sentences, Grievous Harm, Assault, Probation Reports
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Principles Concurrent Sentences Grievous Harm Assault Probation Reports

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hesbon Ratemo Nyandika

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be released on probation as recommended by the probation officer.
  2. 2 Whether the sentences for the two counts should run concurrently or consecutively.
  3. 3 How the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be computed in the applicant's sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court adopted the probation officer's recommendation against the applicant's release, finding no sufficient basis to alter the custodial sentence. The court further clarified that the sentences for the two counts should run concurrently, not consecutively, and directed the prison authorities to amend their records accordingly. The court also ordered that the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing be considered in computing his sentence, in line with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Application for revision of sentence dismissed; sentences to run concurrently; period in custody to be considered in sentence computation.

Orders

  • The applicant shall continue to serve his sentence in custody.
  • The sentences on the two counts shall run concurrently.