[2021] KEELRC 1618 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he was employed by the respondent as head chef for seven years, was coerced to resign, and was not paid his terminal dues. The respondent failed to defend the suit or controvert the claimant's evidence. The court held that the claimant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 1618 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Washington Onyango Nyandiko; Respondent: Director, Samba Mat Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1082 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment_for_claimant
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Forced Resignation, Terminal Benefits, Underpayment of Wages, Statutory Limitation, Overtime Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Washington Onyango Nyandiko
Applicant
Director, Samba Mat Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly and unlawfully dismissed from employment.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal benefits and other monetary claims as pleaded.
- 3 Whether any of the claims are time-barred under the applicable statutory limitation period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that he was employed by the respondent as head chef for seven years, was coerced to resign, and was not paid his terminal dues. The respondent failed to defend the suit or controvert the claimant's evidence. The court held that the claimant was entitled to arrears of salary, underpayments, gratuity, leave, and public holiday pay, but limited the award to claims arising within three years prior to the suit due to statutory limitation. The claim for overtime was dismissed for lack of quantification. Judgment was entered for the claimant for the specified sums, with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
judgment_for_claimant
Orders
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs 9,500 as arrear salary before termination.
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs 619,120 as arrear salary for the three years before dismissal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Nyandiko v Director, Samba Mat Limited (Cause 1082 of 2018) [2021] KEELRC 1618 (KLR) (10 June 2021) (Judgment)
Washington Onyango Nyandiko v Director, Samba Mat Limited [2021] eKLR
Neutral citation: [2021] KEELRC 1618 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause 1082 of 2018
MN Nduma, J
June 10, 2021
Between
Washington Onyango Nyandiko
Claimant
and
The Director, Samba Mat Limited
Respondent
Judgment
1. This suit is undefended. The claim was filed on 27/6/2018 in which the claimant prays for the following reliefs: -i.Arrear salary for 15 days – Kshs 9,500ii.Arrear Salary since June, 2013 – Kshs 154,280iii.Underpayment for 3 years for Kshs 576,000. iv.Gratuity at the rate of 15 days’ salary for each completed year of service – Kshs 66,497. v.Unpaid leave days not taken for 7 days – Kshs 141,859. vi.Unpaid public holidays – Kshs 97,528Total claim Kshs 1,045,664.
2. The respondent was served with summons and the statement of claim but did not enter appearance nor file a statement of defence.
3. The pleadings by the claimant are therefore uncontroverted and so is the testimony by the claimant that he is the claimant herein and he adopted the witness statement dated 27/6/2018 and filed together with a list of documents as his evidence in chief.
4. That he worked for the respondent as the head chef in the year 2011 earning a monthly salary of Kshs 19,000. That he served the respondent diligently for a period of 7 years. That he had a clean record without any disciplinary action taken against him at all.
5. That on 15/3/2018, the respondent coerced the claimant to tender a letter of resignation to pave way for a new chef to be employed. That this was done by the Managing Director.
6. That the claimant tendered the letter of resignation under duress. That the respondent did not pay him terminal benefits or compensation upon termination of his employment.
7. That the claimant demanded to be paid the claims set out in the statement of claim. That the respondent instead brought hired goons to eject the claimant from the restaurant without paying him his terminal benefits on 15/2/2018.
8. That the conduct by the respondent amounted to unlawful and unfair dismissal.
9. That the claimant has suffered immensely due to the dismissal without payment of his dues.
10. That the claimant worked overtime and was not paid and was underpaid as a head chef for the seven years period he worked.
11. That the court to award the claimant as set out in the suit.
Determination 12. The claimant has by the uncontroverted evidence before court discharged the onus placed on him in terms of section 107 and 108 of theEvidence Act, cap 80 Laws of Kenya and has proved his case on a balance of probability that he worked for the respondent for a period of 7 years during which time he served with diligence and was underpaid and not paid various terminal benefits upon being forced to resign from his employment.
13. The court finds that the claimant has proved that he is owed by the respondent as set out in the statement of claim. The court however notes that any claim that goes beyond a period of 3 years before the date of filing suit is time barred. The reliefs set out in the statement of claim are therefore restricted to a period of 3 years before the date of filing suit.
14. The court therefore enters judgment in favour of the claimant against the respondent as follows: -i.Kshs 9,500 being arrear salary before the date of termination.ii.Arrear salary for the 3 year period before the date of dismissal on 15/3/2018 – Kshs 619,120. iii.Underpayments for 3 years – Kshs 576,000. iv.Unpaid gratuity calculated at 15 days’ salary for each completed year of service – Kshs 66,497. v.Payment in lieu of 3 years untaken leave – Kshs 57,000vi.Public holiday worked for 3 years – 41,796.
15. The claim of overtime was not quantified by the claimant and so the court lacks the basis of awarding the same.Total award – Kshs 775,117. (g)Interest at court rates from date of judgment till payment in full.(h)Costs of the suit.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 10THDAY OF JUNE 2021. MATHEWS N. NDUMAJUDGEORDERIn view of the declaration of measures restricting court of operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on 15th March 2020, this Judgment has been delivered to the parties online with their consent. They have waived compliance with Order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court. In permitting this course, this court has been guided by Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution which requires the court to eschew undue technicalities in delivering justice, the right of access to justice guaranteed to every person under Article 48 of the Constitution and the provisions of Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act (chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya) which impose on this court the duty of the court, inter alia, to use suitable technology to enhance the overriding objective which is to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of civil disputes.MATHEWS N. NDUMAJUDGEAppearancesMr. Okenosi for the claimantEkale – Court Assistant