[2023] KEELC 15961 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 15961 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had failed to take any steps in the matter since November 22, 2021, and neither the parties nor their counsel appeared in court to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed. In accordance with Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, the court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 15961 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kennedy Odhiambo Nyaoro; Plaintiff: Caren Atieno Agida; Defendant: Elisha Jabuya Olweru; Interested Party: Raymond Obachi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 27 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
suit dismissed for want of prosecution
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Notice to Show Cause, Bona Fide Purchaser, Land Title Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Notice to Show Cause Bona Fide Purchaser Land Title Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Odhiambo Nyaoro

Plaintiff

Caren Atieno Agida

Plaintiff

Elisha Jabuya Olweru

Defendant

Raymond Obachi

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had failed to take any steps in the matter since November 22, 2021, and neither the parties nor their counsel appeared in court to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed. In accordance with Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution, as there was no explanation or justification for the delay or absence. The dismissal was made without an order as to costs.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed for want of prosecution

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
  • No order as to costs.