[2023] KEBPRT 1223 (KLR)

[2023] KEBPRT 1223 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the landlord's notice dated 27 April 2023 to increase rent was defective and did not comply with the statutory requirements under Section 4(2) and 4(5) of Cap 301. The notice failed to use the prescribed form and did not specify the statutory grounds or provide the tenant with the opportunity...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 1223 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dina Bosibori Nyarango; Respondent: Nicholas Mutua
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E651 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Rent Dispute
Outcome
Tenant's application allowed in part; landlord restrained from increasing rent or evicting tenant; tenant ordered to pay rent arrears within 30 days.
Judges
CN Mugambi
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Rent Increase Notices, Statutory Notice Requirements, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Controlled Tenancy Rent Increase Notices Statutory Notice Requirements Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dina Bosibori Nyarango

Applicant

Nicholas Mutua

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Rent Dispute

  1. 1 Whether the landlord's notice to increase rent was valid under the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act (Cap 301).
  2. 2 Whether the tenant is entitled to injunctive relief restraining the landlord from increasing rent or evicting the tenant.
  3. 3 Whether the tenant is liable for rent arrears.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the landlord's notice dated 27 April 2023 to increase rent was defective and did not comply with the statutory requirements under Section 4(2) and 4(5) of Cap 301. The notice failed to use the prescribed form and did not specify the statutory grounds or provide the tenant with the opportunity to respond as required by law. Consequently, the notice could not form the basis for a lawful rent increase or termination of the tenancy. However, the Tribunal also found that the tenant was in arrears for the months of April, May, June, and July 2023, a fact not disputed by the tenant. The Tribunal therefore restrained the landlord from increasing rent or evicting the tenant...

Court Disposition

Tenant's application allowed in part; landlord restrained from increasing rent or evicting tenant; tenant ordered to pay rent arrears within 30 days.

Orders

  • The landlord/Respondent is hereby restrained from increasing rent and/or evicting the tenant from the suit premises.
  • The tenant is ordered to pay the outstanding rent arrears within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling failing which the landlord will be at liberty to levy distress for the said rent arrears against the tenant.