[2023] KEHC 26794 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient grounds to warrant a review or substitution of the custodial sentence with probation. The applicant was a first offender, but the value of the stolen property was substantial, and none of the stolen motorcycle spare parts were recovered. The trial court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 26794 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Vincent Machuki Nyariaro; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E170 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- HI Ong'udi
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Probation Consideration, First Offender Principle, Remand Custody Deduction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vincent Machuki Nyariaro
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be resentenced to probation instead of imprisonment.
- 2 Whether the period spent in remand custody should be deducted from the sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient grounds to warrant a review or substitution of the custodial sentence with probation. The applicant was a first offender, but the value of the stolen property was substantial, and none of the stolen motorcycle spare parts were recovered. The trial court had considered the applicant's mitigation and guilty plea. The court also noted that the applicant had already served most of his sentence, and after deducting the period spent in remand custody as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, only a short period remained to be served. Therefore, there was no merit in the application for resentencing, and the...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review of sentence is dismissed.
- The applicant will serve the remaining part of the sentence less the period spent in remand custody from December 6, 2022 to February 21, 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Nyariaro v Republic (Criminal Revision E170 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 26794 (KLR) (22 December 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 26794 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisii
Criminal Revision E170 of 2023
HI Ong'udi, J
December 22, 2023
Between
Vincent Machuki Nyariaro
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Revision against the sentence delivered by Hon. P.K. Mutai, S.R.M. on 21st February 2023 in Kisii Criminal Case No. E1265 of 2020)
Ruling
1. Vincent Machuki Nyariaro was charged with stealing contrary to Section 268 as read with section 275 of the Penal Code. The particulars being that on diverse dates between 23rd June 2022- 17th October 2022 at Kegogi Location within Kisii County, he stole several motorcycle spare parts as per the list produced in Court. They were valued at Kshs. 169,420/= the property of Wycliffe Omondi Osumba. He was first arraigned in Court on December 6, 2022 when he denied the charge. On February 21, 2023 he expressed his desire to change plea. The charge and facts were read to him and admitted both of them. He was thereafter convicted on admission. He mitigated and was sentenced to two (2) years imprisonment.
2. He later filed this undated Notice of Motion on June 16, 2023 seeking for a review of the sentence. He specifically wishes to be placed on probation. In his supporting affidavit he states that he was not given an option of a fine nor considered for probation which he prays for. He adds that he was a first offender.
3. The respondent through learned counsel Mr. Ayodo vehemently opposed the application. He submitted that the Trial Court considered everything and the fact that the applicant had pleaded guilty and saved the Court’s time. He added that the applicant had already served one year of his sentence.
4. Before me is the record of the lower court proceedings. The motorcycle was evaluated and an inspection report filed (Exb.1). The general finding was that the motorcycle was uneconomical to repair, and so recommended for boarding. The value of the vandalized parts was KShs. 169,420/=.
5. The court had called for a Probation Officer’s Report but the same has not been availed to the court to date. Besides indicating that he was a first offender he has not fully stated why the sentence of two years should be reduced or substituted to probation.
6. There is no evidence of any of the spare parts having been recovered hence the complainant lost all the listed spare parts of his motorcycle. The applicant was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment, on February 21, 2023. He will only serve 2/3 of the sentence which comes to 16 months, twelve of which he has already served. This leaves him with 4 months to serve.
7. He was in remand custody from December 6, 2022 to February 21, 2023. In line with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, this period will be deducted from the 4 months which leaves him with a period of less than two (2) months.
8. I do not therefore find any merit in the application for re-sentencing, which I hereby dismiss. The applicant will serve the remaining part of the sentence less the period spent in remand custody from December 6, 2022 -February 21, 2023.
9. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED AT KISII THIS 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2023. H.I. ONG’UDIJUDGEIn the presence of:ApplicantMr. Ochengo for the StateOtieno: Court Assistant