[2024] KECPT 1163 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1163 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Memorandum of Agreement dated 23/6/2016 required the Respondent to transfer titles to the Claimant's members before the balance of the purchase price was payable. The Respondent's refusal to transfer titles and demand for full payment prior to transfer constituted a breach of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1163 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nyati Housing Co-operative Society Limited; Respondent: Ngossheny Housing Co-operative Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 237 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Case / Judgment After Consent on Main Claim; Counterclaim Determined
Outcome
Counterclaim dismissed; main claim settled by consent; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sale of Land, Breach of Contract, Specific Performance, Transfer of Title, Cooperative Societies, Remedies
Source Language
en
Land and Property Commercial and Corporate Sale of Land Breach of Contract Specific Performance Transfer of Title Cooperative Societies Remedies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyati Housing Co-operative Society Limited

Applicant

Ngossheny Housing Co-operative Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Case / Judgment After Consent on Main Claim; Counterclaim Determined

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent/Claimant in the Counter Claim is entitled to general damages for alleged losses arising from inhibition placed on land titles by the Claimant.
  2. 2 Whether the parties breached the Memorandum of Agreement dated 23/6/2016 and, if so, which party was in breach.
  3. 3 Whether the Counter Claim by the Respondent has merit.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Memorandum of Agreement dated 23/6/2016 required the Respondent to transfer titles to the Claimant's members before the balance of the purchase price was payable. The Respondent's refusal to transfer titles and demand for full payment prior to transfer constituted a breach of the agreement. The Tribunal noted that the agreement was vague regarding the number and identity of plots, but the parties had subsequently entered into a consent settling the main claim, with only costs and the counterclaim remaining. The Respondent's counterclaim for general damages failed because the Respondent was the party in breach and could not claim damages for consequences arising...

Court Disposition

Counterclaim dismissed; main claim settled by consent; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Counterclaim dated 18/9/2020 is dismissed.
  • If there are any restrictions (inhibitions) on the titles, the same should be lifted within 14 days.