[2022] KEELC 2438 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 2438 (KLR)

The court held that the pending application for review and stay of judgment is an interlocutory matter that must be heard and determined on its merits before the main petition is disposed of. This is mandated by the constitutional right to a fair hearing and the audi alteram partem rule, which require that no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 2438 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samuel Nyauke; Respondent: Homa-Bay Sub-County Administrator; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Earnest Bin Amito; Respondent: Joint Base Nava Enterprises Limited; Respondent: Director General National Environment Management Authority (NEMA)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Petition E001 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Petition / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Judgment and Review of Orders Pending Hearing of Application
Outcome
Stay of pending judgment granted; directions issued for hearing of the application for review.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Stay of Judgment, Review of Court Orders, Right to Be Heard, Audi Alteram Partem, Written Submissions, Alternative Dispute Resolution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Environmental Law Stay of Judgment Review of Court Orders Right to Be Heard Audi Alteram Partem Written Submissions Alternative Dispute Resolution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Nyauke

Applicant

Homa-Bay Sub-County Administrator

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Earnest Bin Amito

Respondent

Joint Base Nava Enterprises Limited

Respondent

Director General National Environment Management Authority (NEMA)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Petition / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Judgment and Review of Orders Pending Hearing of Application

  1. 1 Whether the pending application seeking review of the court's orders and stay of judgment should be heard before delivery of the pending judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the parties are entitled to a fair hearing on the interlocutory application before the main petition is determined.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the pending application for review and stay of judgment is an interlocutory matter that must be heard and determined on its merits before the main petition is disposed of. This is mandated by the constitutional right to a fair hearing and the audi alteram partem rule, which require that no adverse decision be made without giving the affected party an opportunity to be heard. The court emphasized that procedural fairness and justice demand that the application be considered prior to delivery of judgment in the main petition. Accordingly, the court stayed the delivery of the pending judgment and set timelines for the parties to file and serve written submissions on the...

Court Disposition

Stay of pending judgment granted; directions issued for hearing of the application for review.

Orders

  • There be stay of the pending judgment to pave way for hearing on merits the pending application dated 21st March 2022.
  • The pending application to be heard by way of written submissions; applicant to file and serve within three days, respondents within seven days thereafter.