[2024] KEHC 349 (KLR)
The court found that although the respondent resides on the disputed property and the appellant does not, the dispute over rental income is quantifiable and not illusory. Prior to the impugned judgment, rents were paid to the appellant. To ensure justice and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, the court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 349 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Fridah Nyawera; Respondent: Abdirahman Muweka Miunge
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E199 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay and Injunction Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay of execution and interim orders granted pending appeal.
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Injunctive Relief, Succession Disputes, Rental Income Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fridah Nyawera
Appellant
Abdirahman Muweka Miunge
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay and Injunction Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree pending appeal.
- 2 Whether a temporary injunction should issue to restrain the respondent from interfering with the suit property and rental income.
- 3 Whether the collection of rents should be secured pending determination of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the respondent resides on the disputed property and the appellant does not, the dispute over rental income is quantifiable and not illusory. Prior to the impugned judgment, rents were paid to the appellant. To ensure justice and preserve the subject matter of the appeal, the court ordered that rents from the property be deposited into a joint account of both parties, or into court if no joint account is opened within 14 days. The court also granted a stay of execution of the judgment and decree pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, and directed the appellant to file and serve the record of appeal within 45 days. The court exercised its...
Court Disposition
Stay of execution and interim orders granted pending appeal.
Orders
- Pending the hearing and determination of this appeal, there shall be a stay of judgment dated 26th October, 2023 and decree issued in Isiolo Kadhi Succession Cause No. E001 of 2023.
- Pending the hearing and the determination of the appeal, rents due from Plot. 7918/147 Isiolo Town shall be deposited into a joint account of both the appellant and the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Nyawera v Miunge (Civil Appeal E199 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 349 (KLR) (25 January 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 349 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Civil Appeal E199 of 2023
TW Cherere, J
January 25, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MARY WAITHIRA ABDURAHMAN alias KHADIJA MATHENGE (DECEASED)
Between
Fridah Nyawera
Appellant
and
Abdirahman Muweka Miunge
Respondent
Ruling
Introduction 1. By judgment dated 26th October, 2023, the trial Court in Isiolo Kadhi Succession Cause No. E001 of 2023 determined that Applicant/Appellant is not a beneficiary of deceased’s seat.
2. By notice of motion dated 10th November, 2023 and filed on 16th November, 2023, Applicant seeks orders for:1. Stay of execution of the judgment dated 26th October, 2023 and the decree thereof2. Temporary injunction to restrain the Respondent, his agents, employees, servants advocates, auctioneers or any other person acting on his behalf from interfering, intimidating, harassing, evicting and/or in any other manner interfering with the property known as Plot. 7918/147 Isiolo Town pending the hearing and determination of this appeal3. Costs be provided for
3. The application is based on the grounds among others that Appellant being dissatisfied with the lower court’s decision preferred this appeal and Respondent has began intermeddling with the suit property and has threatened to evict the Appellant and also instructed tenants to pay rents to him.
4. The application is equally supported by an affidavit sworn by the Appellant on 14th November, 2023 in which she reiterates the grounds on the face of the Application.
5. By his replying affidavit sworn on 02nd January, 2024, Respondent opposes the application on the grounds among others that Applicant stays in Nairobi and her allegation that she ahs been threatened with eviction is untrue. Respondent denies intermeddling with the estate which he says is his home and avers that all he has done is request that rents be paid to him and not the Appellant. Additionally, Respondent denies that Appellant is likely to suffer any irreparable damage by being deprived of rental income.
Analysis And Determination 6. I have carefully considered the application in the light of the affidavits on record.
7. The issues that have arisen from the affidavits are that Respondent lives on the dispute property while the Appellant does not. That being the case, the allegation that Respondent is intermeddling with the estate property or has threatened to evict the Appellant does not lie.
8. It is not disputed that prior to the delivery of the judgment dated 26th October, 2023, rents due from the estate were paid to the Appellant and not to the Respondent and Appellant’s appeal cannot in the circumstances be dismissed as a sham.
9. Whereas the dispute currently concerns collection of rents which are quantifiable, I find that it would be in the interest of justice to secure the rents pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
10. For the reasons given on the assessment above, it is hereby ordered:1. Pending the hearing and determination of this appeal, there shall be a stay of judgment dated 26th October, 2023 and decree issued in Isiolo Kadhi Succession Cause No. E001 of 20232. Pending the hearing and the determination of the appeal, rents due from Plot. 7918/147 Isiolo Town shall be deposited into a joint account of both the Appellant and the Respondent3. In the event that the parties fail to open an account in the next 14 days, rents due shall be paid into court4. Appellant is directed to file and serve the record of appeal in the next 45 days5. Pursuant to section 65 (1) (c) of the Civil Procedure Act, the Deputy Registrar of this court is directed to liaise with the Chief Kadhi to appoint assessors that will sit with the judge during the hearing of the appeal6. Costs shall abide the outcome of the appeal7. Mention on 29th April, 2024 to confirm compliance with these orders and for direction as to the disposal of the appeal
DATED IN MERU THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024. WAMAE. T.W. CHEREREJUDGEAppearancesCourt Assistants - Kinoti/MuneneFor Appellant - Mr. Mwiti for Mutuma & Gichuru Associates AdvocatesFor Respondent - Mr. Mwirigi for Mukira Mbaya & Co. Advocates