[2024] KECA 1453 (KLR)

[2024] KECA 1453 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's notice of motion was an omnibus application, improperly combining a request for extension of time (which should be heard by a single judge) and a request for stay of execution (which should be heard by a full bench). This procedural defect rendered the application incompetent....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECA 1453 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dr Ferdinand Chirure Nyongesa; Respondent: Masinde Muliro University Of Science & Technology; Respondent: The Chair of Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology; Respondent: Vice Chancellor Masinde Muliro University Of Science & Technology; Interested Party: Dr Janett N Kasilly; Interested Party: Dr Bernadette Sabuni; Interested Party: John Muhehe; Interested Party: Dr Alexander Khaemba; Interested Party: Dr Joseph Nasongo Wamoche; Interested Party: Dr Judah Ndiku
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E125 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Single Judge Ruling on Omnibus Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application struck out as defective
Judges
HM Okwengu
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Omnibus Application, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Extension of Time Stay of Execution Omnibus Application Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Ferdinand Chirure Nyongesa

Applicant

Masinde Muliro University Of Science & Technology

Respondent

The Chair of Masinde Muliro University of Science & Technology

Respondent

Vice Chancellor Masinde Muliro University Of Science & Technology

Respondent

Dr Janett N Kasilly

Interested Party

Dr Bernadette Sabuni

Interested Party

John Muhehe

Interested Party

Dr Alexander Khaemba

Interested Party

Dr Joseph Nasongo Wamoche

Interested Party

Dr Judah Ndiku

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Single Judge Ruling on Omnibus Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's omnibus application seeking both extension of time and stay of execution is properly before a single judge.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant complied with the court's directions regarding service of the hearing notice.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's notice of motion was an omnibus application, improperly combining a request for extension of time (which should be heard by a single judge) and a request for stay of execution (which should be heard by a full bench). This procedural defect rendered the application incompetent. Furthermore, the applicant failed to comply with the court's direction to serve the hearing notice as required. Consequently, the court struck out the application, but granted the applicant liberty to file a proper application in accordance with the rules.

Court Disposition

application struck out as defective

Orders

  • The application is struck out as defective.
  • The applicant is at liberty to file an appropriate application in accordance with the rules of the Court.