[2025] KEHC 196 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 196 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds for urgency and for the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders against the decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board made on 10/1/2025. The court certified the matter as urgent, granted leave, and issued detailed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 196 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nyonjoro East Africa Limited; Respondent: The Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Respondent: The Accounting Officer, North Rift Valley Water Works Development Agency; Interested Party: Rumhas Construction Company Limited; Interested Party: Mabac Enterprises Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application E007 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Leave Application Ruling
Outcome
Leave granted; matter certified urgent; directions issued for further proceedings.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Leave, Public Procurement Challenges, Procedural Timelines
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Leave Public Procurement Challenges Procedural Timelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyonjoro East Africa Limited

Applicant

The Public Procurement Administrative Review Board

Respondent

The Accounting Officer, North Rift Valley Water Works Development Agency

Respondent

Rumhas Construction Company Limited

Interested Party

Mabac Enterprises Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Miscellaneous Application / Leave Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient grounds for grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders.
  2. 2 Whether the application is urgent and warrants certification as such.
  3. 3 What are the appropriate directions for filing and service of the substantive motion and responses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds for urgency and for the grant of leave to apply for judicial review orders against the decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board made on 10/1/2025. The court certified the matter as urgent, granted leave, and issued detailed directions for the filing and service of the substantive motion and responses. The court emphasized the need for expeditious handling of the matter and strict compliance with the set timelines to ensure fair and efficient determination of the dispute.

Court Disposition

Leave granted; matter certified urgent; directions issued for further proceedings.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to apply for judicial review orders as sought.
  • The matter is certified as urgent.