https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1116

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1116

The application was not properly before the Court because the relief sought was a reference from a single judge decision, which must be pursued before a full court under the applicable rules; a single judge has no jurisdiction to determine such a reference or sit on appeal against a fellow single judge's decision.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KECA 1116 (KLR)
Parties
1st Applicant: James Nzioka; 2nd Applicant: Musembi Nzioka; 3rd Applicant: Joseph Katwiwa Nzioka; 4th Applicant: Maurice Kioko Nzioka; Respondent: Hillary Ngumbau Nzioka; Interested Party: Magdalene Wanza Kioko
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E525 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Lodge a Reference Out of Time
Outcome
Application not entertained; file returned to the registry for pursuit of the proper reference procedure.
Judges
["S ole Kantai"]
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Reference Against Single Judge Decision, Court of Appeal Procedure, Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal, Compliance With Procedural Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appellate Procedure Succession Law Extension of Time Reference Against Single Judge Decision Court of Appeal Procedure Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal Compliance With Procedural Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Nzioka

1st Applicant

Musembi Nzioka

2nd Applicant

Joseph Katwiwa Nzioka

3rd Applicant

Maurice Kioko Nzioka

4th Applicant

Hillary Ngumbau Nzioka

Respondent

Magdalene Wanza Kioko

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to Lodge a Reference Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time to lodge a reference was properly before the Court
  2. 2 Whether a single judge could entertain a reference application
  3. 3 Whether the applicants had complied with the procedure under the Court of Appeal Rules

Ratio Decidendi

The application was not properly before the Court because the relief sought was a reference from a single judge decision, which must be pursued before a full court under the applicable rules; a single judge has no jurisdiction to determine such a reference or sit on appeal against a fellow single judge's decision.

Court Disposition

Application not entertained; file returned to the registry for pursuit of the proper reference procedure.

Orders

  • File to be returned to the registry.
  • Applicants to pursue their avenue through a reference.