Kenya Judgment

High Court · High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)

In the Matter of Baby T B - Minor [2014] KEHC 3930 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the Applicants had fulfilled all statutory and procedural requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law. They had obtained the necessary approvals from both German and Kenyan authorities, had custody of the child for the requisite period, and demonstrated the ability to provide for the child’s welfare. The child was declared free for adoption, and all reports from relevant agencies were favorable. The court determined that granting the adoption was in the best interest of the child, especially given the child’s abandonment and the Applicants’ commitment to assume full parental responsibilities and facilitate post-adoption supervision.

Court disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants, O G and F G, are authorized to adopt baby T B, who shall henceforth be known as T B G.
  • J O S is appointed as the legal guardian of the child should misfortune befall the Applicants.
  • The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register.
  • The guardian ad litem is discharged.

02

Material facts

Parties

O G

Applicant

F G

Applicant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Adoption Cause / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Applicants argued that they have complied with all legal requirements for international adoption, including obtaining approvals from the relevant authorities in Germany and Kenya. They have had custody of the child for the required period, have bonded with the child, and are financially and emotionally capable of caring for him. They undertook to provide post-adoption supervision and to accord the child their citizenship.
Respondent
There was no formal respondent; however, reports from the Director of Children’s Services, the guardian ad litem, and the adoption societies were all favorable and recommended the adoption. No objections were raised, and the biological parents could not be traced despite efforts by the police.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Children Act, 2001 (Kenya), Section 4

    The best interests of the child are paramount in adoption proceedings.

  2. 02

    Children Act, 2001 (Kenya), Sections 156, 162

    International adoptions require approval from both the country of origin and the receiving country, and compliance with all statutory requirements.

  3. 03

    Children Act, 2001 (Kenya), Section 159

    Consent of biological parents may be dispensed with if the child is abandoned and efforts to trace parents have failed.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the Applicants had fulfilled all statutory and procedural requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law. They had obtained the necessary approvals from both German and Kenyan authorities, had custody of the child for the requisite period, and demonstrated the ability to provide for the child’s welfare. The child was declared free for adoption, and all reports from relevant agencies were favorable. The court determined that granting the adoption was in the best interest of the child, especially given the child’s abandonment and the Applicants’ commitment to assume full parental responsibilities and facilitate post-adoption supervision.

Obiter and limits

  • The Applicants have undertaken to provide the child with their citizenship and to allow post-adoption supervision by the relevant authorities.
  • An adoption order, once issued, is final and binding and cannot be recanted.
  • The child shall have the right to inherit the Applicants' property as if born to them.

Court disposition

adoption granted

  • The Applicants, O G and F G, are authorized to adopt baby T B, who shall henceforth be known as T B G.
  • J O S is appointed as the legal guardian of the child should misfortune befall the Applicants.
  • The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register.
  • The guardian ad litem is discharged.

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2014] KEHC 3930 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 73 OF 2014

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001

AND

IN THE MATTER OF BABY T B - MINOR

O G…………………………...…………….......……………………..1ST APPLICANT

F G….….……….….…..…………………………………..........……2ND APPLICANT

JUDGMENT

The Applicants, O G and F G are German citizens. They were married on 3rd April 2008. The 1st Applicant is a Web Developer while the 2nd Applicant is a Teacher. The Applicants have so far not been blessed with children of their own due to medical reasons. The Applicants wish to adopt a child. The Applicants approached the relevant authorities in Germany with a view to securing the requisite approvals to enable them adopt a child, specifically a foreign child. The Applicants were investigated by HELP a Child e.V. Children Find Parents – Germany, a foreign adoption society duly approved by the Federal Central Authority for Intercountry adoptions under the Federal Office of Justice in Germany. The Applicants were further assessed by the Youth and Family Department Adoption Office, Hamburg. The said authority approved the Applicants’ application to adopt a child from Kenya on 16th May 2012. The National Adoption Committee of Kenya duly approved the application by the Applicants to adopt a child in Kenya. The approval certificate to that effect was issued on 18th September 2013.

Baby T B, the child, the subject of these adoption proceedings was found abandoned near Lenana Primary School in Milimani Estate in Nakuru on 13th August 2012. A report was made on the same day to Nakuru Police Station. The child was taken to Haven of Hope Baby Center for care and protection. The Children’s Court Nakuru committed the custody of the child to the said children’s home on 28th December 2012 pending these adoption proceedings. The child was placed under the custody of the Applicants on 27th November 2013 for compulsory foster care pending these adoption proceedings. Since then, the child has been in the care and custody of the Applicants. According to the police, their effort to trace the biological parents of the child has been in vain. No one has come forward to claim the child. A report to that effect has been filed in court. This court therefore dispenses with the consent of the biological parents to the proposed adoption by the Applicants. KKPI, an Adoption Society issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption. The certificate is dated 24th April 2013.

The court read the reports prepared by KKPI, the local adoption society, HELP a Child e.V. Children Find Parents – Germany, the Youth and Family Department Adoption Office, Hamburg, the Director of Children’s Services and by Lucy Nyawira, the guardian ad litem. All the above reports are favourable and recommend the Applicants’ application to adopt the child. This is an international adoption. There are certain conditions that the Applicants must fulfill before this court can allow them to adopt the child. The first condition is that the Applicants must be approved by the relevant adoption authorities in their country of origin. In the present case, the Applicants have been assessed and approved by the relevant authorities in their country of origin, Germany. This court had the benefit of reading the report prepared by the foreign adoption society. This court is satisfied that the Applicants have been approved by the relevant authorities in Germany to adopt a foreign child, and specifically a Kenyan child. The second condition is that the Applicants must be approved by the National Adoption Committee in Kenya to adopt a child in Kenya. The Applicants have been assessed by the said National Adoption Committee. A certificate has been issued by the said committee approving the Applicants’ application to adopt a child in Kenya. The third condition is that the Applicants must satisfy

the court that they have fulfilled the legal requirements pertaining the adoption, including having custody of the child for a sufficient period to enable bonding to take place. This period must not be less than three (3) months. It was clear to the court that the Applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements in respect to international adoption. The Applicants have had the custody of the child since 27th November 2013. In the period that the child has been in their custody, the child has bonded with them. This was evident from the reports prepared by the Director of Children’s Services, the guardian ad litem and the local adoption society. The Applicants have established that they have the financial and emotional capability to take care of the child.

Having evaluated all the reports on record, and the Applicants’ application seeking to be granted permission to adopt the child, it was clear to this court that it would be in the best interest of the child for the application for adoption to be allowed. The Applicants have given an undertaking that they shall give access to the approved adoption society in their country of origin to undertake post-adoption supervision for a period of three (3) years from the time of the issuance of this adoption order. The Applicants have executed an undertaking that if this court grants the adoption order, they will permanently assume all the parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if she was born to them in their marriage; they have been made aware that once the adoption order is issued, it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child that they shall adopt; that the child shall have the right to inherit their property; that an adoption order cannot be recanted, and further, that they shall not give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviours or other changes in the child; that the adoption society in Germany (foreign adoption society) shall provide annual follow up reports on the progress of the child to the adoption society in Kenya (local adoption society) for a period of three (3) years from the date of the arrival of the child in Germany; that the Applicants undertake to allow the representatives of the foreign adoption society in Germany free access to the child at any reasonable time. The Applicants further give an undertaking that they shall accord their citizenship to the child.

In the premises therefore, this court finds that the Applicants have met the criteria set for international adoptions. The Applicants, O G and F G are hereby authorized to adopt baby T B. The child shall henceforth be known as T B G. His date of birth shall be 14th June 2012. His place of birth shall be Milimani, Nakuru- Kenya. He is presumed to be a Kenyan. J O S, a friend of the Applicants is hereby appointed to be the legal guardian of the child should misfortune befall the Applicants. The Registrar General is hereby directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. It is so ordered.

DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014.

L. KIMARU

JUDGE

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Children Act, 2001 (Kenya)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.