[2011] KEHC 2484 (KLR)
The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by their separation of over 11 years and lack of interest in reconciliation. Both parties alleged cruelty but failed to provide reliable evidence. The court held that it would be futile and against...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 2484 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: O.A.S.; Respondent: T.G.B.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 1 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition for divorce allowed; marriage dissolved; orders for child maintenance and costs issued.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Child Maintenance, Custody and Access
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O.A.S.
Applicant
T.G.B.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has irretrievably broken down and should be dissolved.
- 2 Whether either party is entitled to maintenance for the child of the marriage and in what amount.
- 3 Who should bear the costs of the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by their separation of over 11 years and lack of interest in reconciliation. Both parties alleged cruelty but failed to provide reliable evidence. The court held that it would be futile and against public policy to attempt to reunite them. Regarding the child, E.J., the court determined that both parents are responsible for his maintenance. However, due to the parties' unwillingness to disclose their actual incomes, the court set a reasonable monthly maintenance amount for the respondent and ordered him to pay half of the actual school fees, with liberty to either party to...
Court Disposition
Petition for divorce allowed; marriage dissolved; orders for child maintenance and costs issued.
Orders
- The marriage between O.A.S. and T.G.B. celebrated on 14.8.1997 is dissolved with a decree nisi issuing for 3 months.
- Either party may apply to make the decree absolute after 3 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT BUSIA
DIVORCE CAUSE NO.1 OF 2004
O.A.S.......................................................................................................PETITIONER
=VERSUS=
T.G.B.....................................................................................................RESPONDENT
J U D G E M E N T
The Petitioner O.A.S. and the Respondent, T.G.B., are wife and husband. When the Petitioner served the Petition, the Respondent filed a Cross-Petition.
The marriage was celebrated on 14. 8.1997 under the Marriage Act at V[...] District Marriage Registry. The parties got one issue, E.J., now said to be 12 years old.
The Petitioner based her petition on alleged cruelty of the Respondent during the marriage. The Respondent on the other hand also averred the ground of cruelty of the Petitioner as well. Both parties did not appear to have kept any reliable record of acts of cruelty from the other party.
It was, however, very clear that the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent is irretrievably broken down. They separated over 11 years ago and did not show any little interest of coming together now or in the near future.
In the circumstances it would be futile exercise by the court to try to rejoin them. Indeed it would be against public policy to do so since they have each made up their mind to be set free to chart a new course of life.
There is, however, the issue of the child E.J. He definitely needs protection of court. The child has since the year 2000, been living with his mother, the Petitioner. While she claimed that the Respondent sporadically contributed to the welfare of the child, the latter denied such allegation. He said, and his evidence was not seriously denied, that he always paid school fees and bought school requirements for the child. The Petitioner sought Kshs30,000/= as maintenance for the child per month. While the Respondent agreed to carry his responsibility for the child, he nevertheless said he currently had no job while the income of the Petitioner as a high school teacher, should seriously be considered as the basis of the child’s source of maintenance.
I have carefully considered the issue of maintenance for the child. I am persuaded that both parties have the responsibility to take care of the child. Their incomes would therefore, be relevant and crucial in deciding the amount payable by either party. Unfortunately each was unwilling to disclose their actual income. This court cannot manufacture such figures by itself.
In the circumstances the court makes the following orders:-
ORDERS
1. The marriage between the parties herein O ASand TGB celebrated on 14. 8.1997 is hereby dissolved with a decree nisiissuing for 3 months.
2. Either party is at liberty thereafter to apply to court to make the decree absolute.
3. The Respondent, TGB shall monthly pay to the Petitioner for the maintenance of the child E.J., Kshs7000/= (seven thousand) per month with effect from 1st June, 2011 with liberty to either party to apply to court for modification if justified.
4. The Respondent in addition to 3 above, shall pay half the actual school fees payable at E.J’s school ascertainable by a certificate to be issued by the Headmaster of the school.
5. Each party to bear own costs.
Dated and delivered at Busia this 16th day of June 2011.
D.A. ONYANCHA
JUDGE.