[2024] KEHC 6186 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6186 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had absconded court proceedings and breached bond terms, resulting in periods of custody that were self-imposed due to his own actions. The court held that such periods of custody, arising from abscondment and breach of bond, do not qualify for consideration under Section 333(2) of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6186 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Erick Otieno Obar; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E081 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Pre Sentence Custody Period
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Pre Sentence Custody, False Pretences, Document Offences, Bond Breach
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Pre Sentence Custody False Pretences Document Offences Bond Breach

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erick Otieno Obar

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Pre Sentence Custody Period

  1. 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of sentence based on time allegedly spent in custody before conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had absconded court proceedings and breached bond terms, resulting in periods of custody that were self-imposed due to his own actions. The court held that such periods of custody, arising from abscondment and breach of bond, do not qualify for consideration under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant's conduct, including causing delays and evading court processes, disentitled him from the relief sought. Consequently, the court declined to review the sentence or grant the orders sought, emphasizing that the applicant was the author of his own misfortune.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • This file is closed.