[2001] KECA 52 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 52 (KLR)

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the application for stay of execution as requested by the applicants' counsel, noting that the respondent's counsel had no objection. In accordance with established civil procedure, the Court ordered that the withdrawal be with costs to the respondent. The decision was based on...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 52 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Obedi Maina; Applicant: John Menywa; Applicant: Bernard Kariuki; Applicant: Joseph Kigathi; Applicant: Peter N. Gitau; Applicant: Kennedy Mutalii; Applicant: Peter Wachira; Applicant: Agnes Wamukota; Applicant: Naomi Ombasa; Applicant: Farida Ajira; Applicant: James Njoroge; Respondent: Kitale Municipal Council
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application 1 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application withdrawn with costs to the respondent.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Withdrawal of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Withdrawal of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Obedi Maina

Applicant

John Menywa

Applicant

Bernard Kariuki

Applicant

Joseph Kigathi

Applicant

Peter N. Gitau

Applicant

Kennedy Mutalii

Applicant

Peter Wachira

Applicant

Agnes Wamukota

Applicant

Naomi Ombasa

Applicant

Farida Ajira

Applicant

James Njoroge

Applicant

Kitale Municipal Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution should be withdrawn with costs to the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the application for stay of execution as requested by the applicants' counsel, noting that the respondent's counsel had no objection. In accordance with established civil procedure, the Court ordered that the withdrawal be with costs to the respondent. The decision was based on the mutual consent of both parties and the discretion of the Court to award costs upon withdrawal of an application.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn with costs to the respondent.

Orders

  • The application is withdrawn with costs to the respondent.