[2024] KEHC 4856 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's request for the period spent in pretrial custody to be considered in the computation of his sentence was merited under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court confirmed that the applicant was not granted bail during his trial and had been in custody since 6th...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 4856 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Mote Obero; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E031 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Ruling on Resentencing and Computation of Sentence
- Outcome
- application partially allowed
- Judges
- A. Ong’injo
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Computation of Sentence, Section 333 2 Criminal Procedure Code, Murder Sentencing, Rehabilitation, Pretrial Custody Credit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Mote Obero
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Resentencing and Computation of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in pretrial custody considered in the computation of his sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the forty-year sentence imposed upon resentencing was harsh and excessive in light of the applicant's age, rehabilitation, and time already served.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's request for the period spent in pretrial custody to be considered in the computation of his sentence was merited under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court confirmed that the applicant was not granted bail during his trial and had been in custody since 6th June 2003. Consequently, the court ordered that the forty-year sentence imposed upon resentencing in Mombasa Petition No. 18 of 2018 should run from the date the applicant was first arraigned in court, thereby giving effect to the statutory requirement to account for pretrial custody. The court declined to further reduce the sentence, noting that the application for resentencing...
Court Disposition
application partially allowed
Orders
- The sentence of forty years imprisonment imposed in Mombasa Petition No. 18 of 2018 shall run from 6th June 2003, the date the applicant was first arraigned in court.
- No further reduction of sentence is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Obero v Republic (Criminal Petition E031 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 4856 (KLR) (25 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4856 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Mombasa
Criminal Petition E031 of 2023
A. Ong’injo, J
April 25, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 22(1), 23(1), 25(c), 27, 28, 50(2)(p)(q), 159(2), 160(1), AND 165 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTIONS 216, 329 AND 333(2) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE CAP 75 LAWS OF KENYA
Between
Peter Mote Obero
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant was charged, convicted and sentenced to suffer death for the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with 204 of the Penal Code in Mombasa High Court Criminal Case No. 7 of 2003.
2. The Applicant appealed the decision in Mombasa Court of Appeal Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 2008 but the same was dismissed.
3. The Applicant lodged a resentencing petition to the High Court at Mombasa vide Petition No. 18 of 2018 whereby the life sentence was substituted with a fourty (40) year sentence on 30th March 2020.
4. The Applicant argues that the fourty (40) year sentence is harsh and excessive since it fails to put into consideration that a human being’s life expectancy is seventy (70) years and that the Applicant has been in lawful custody for the last twenty (20) years a period during which he has undergone sufficient rehabilitation.
5. The application herein was substantively and conclusively dealt with in Mombasa Petition No. 18 of 2018 where Ogola, J. substituted life imprisonment with 40 years on 30. 3.2020 on account of the circumstances of the case.
6. In cognizant of the fact that the Applicant’s trial took place when capital offences were not bailable and having perused the records in Mombasa High Court No. 7 of 2003 and confirmed that indeed the Applicant was not granted bail, the Applicant’s prayer under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is allowed. The sentence of 40 years imprisonment in Mombasa Petition No. 18 of 2018 is ordered to run from 6th June 2003 when the Applicant was first arraigned in court.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT/ONLINE THROUGH MS TEAMS, THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2024HON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGEIn the presence of: -Etropia- Court AssistantMr. Ngiri for the RespondentApplicant present in personHON. LADY JUSTICE A. ONG’INJOJUDGE