[2019] KEHC 7221 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was not inordinate and was satisfactorily explained by the delay in obtaining a certified copy of the ruling from the trial court. The application for leave to appeal out of time was filed less than three weeks after the certified ruling was supplied....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 7221 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Obiero Bogonko Paul; Respondent: Muthua George; Respondent: Paul Muturi Gicheha
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 542 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- CW Githua
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Appeals From Subordinate Courts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Obiero Bogonko Paul
Applicant
Muthua George
Respondent
Paul Muturi Gicheha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause to warrant extension of time to file an appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was inordinate or satisfactorily explained.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was not inordinate and was satisfactorily explained by the delay in obtaining a certified copy of the ruling from the trial court. The application for leave to appeal out of time was filed less than three weeks after the certified ruling was supplied. The court exercised its discretion under Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act to grant the extension, finding that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay. The absence of opposition from the respondents further supported the grant of the orders sought.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to file his intended appeal within the next fourteen days.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYAAT NAIROBI
MISC APPLICATION NO. 542 OF 2018
OBIERO BOGONKO PAUL …………………………... APPLICANT
VERSUS
MUTHUA GEORGE………………………….....1STRESPONDENT
PAUL MUTURI GICHEHA…....…………….....2NDRESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant Obiero Bogonko Paul in his Notice of Motion dated 25th October 2018 seeks that he be granted leave to file an appeal against the ruling of Hon. A M Obura (Mrs) in Milimani CMCC No. 2108 of 2012 out of time.
2. In the grounds supporting the motion and in the supporting affidavit, the applicant avers that he is desirous of filing an appeal against the trial court’s ruling dated 7th August 2018 which dismissed his suit; that the delay in filing the appeal was not deliberate but was caused by the trial court’s delay of about 30 days in supplying him with a certified copy of the impugned ruling; that his intended appeal has high chances of success and if the application is not allowed, he will suffer great prejudice.
3. The application is not opposed. The respondent despite being duly served with the application and a hearing notice did not file any response to the application.
4. I have considered the application and the depositions in the supporting affidavit as well as the annextures thereto.
Section 79 Gof theCivil Procedure Actprescribes the time within which appeals from decisions or orders of the subordinate court to the High Court should be filed. Such appeals should be filed within a period of 30 days but in the event that an aggrieved party is unable to file his appeal within the prescribed time, the proviso to Section 79 G gives the court unfettered discretion to enlarge the aforesaid time provided sufficient cause is shown for not filing the intended appeal within time.
5. In this case, the ruling sought to be appealed against was delivered on 7th August 2018 meaning that the applicant’s intended appeal ought to have been filed on or about 7th September 2018. The impugned ruling which is annexed to the supporting affidavit was certified by the trial court on 11th October 2018. The instant application was filed on 31st October 2018 less than three weeks thereafter. I am thus satisfied that the delay is not inordinate and it is satisfactorily explained.
6. In the premises, I find that the application is merited and it is hereby allowed. The applicant is granted leave to file his intended appeal within the next fourteen days. As the application is not opposed, I will not make any order on costs.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 24th day of May, 2019.
C. W. GITHUA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
No appearance for the applicant
No appearance for the respondent
Mr. Salach: Court Assistant