[2025] KEHC 2762 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment on the basis of the certificate of costs dated 5th August, 2024, as there was no evidence that the certificate had been set aside or varied. The court relied on the principle that a certificate of costs, once issued and not challenged, is conclusive and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2762 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Clifford Otieno Obiero t/a C Obiero & Associate Advocates; Respondent: County Secretary, County Government of Kisumu; Respondent: CEC Finance, County Government of Kisumu; Respondent: County Government of Kisumu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous E135 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion for Judgment on Certificate of Costs
- Outcome
- judgment entered for the applicant as prayed; file closed
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Costs, Judgment Entry, Taxation of Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clifford Otieno Obiero t/a C Obiero & Associate Advocates
Applicant
County Secretary, County Government of Kisumu
Respondent
CEC Finance, County Government of Kisumu
Respondent
County Government of Kisumu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion for Judgment on Certificate of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment on the basis of a certificate of costs that has not been set aside or varied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment on the basis of the certificate of costs dated 5th August, 2024, as there was no evidence that the certificate had been set aside or varied. The court relied on the principle that a certificate of costs, once issued and not challenged, is conclusive and enforceable. Accordingly, judgment was entered in favor of the applicant as prayed.
Court Disposition
judgment entered for the applicant as prayed; file closed
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favor of the applicant as prayed in the motion dated 18th September, 2024.
- The file is closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Obiero t/a C Obiero & Associate Advocates v County Secretary, County Government of Kisumu & 2 others (Civil Miscellaneous E135 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 2762 (KLR) (13 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2762 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Civil Miscellaneous E135 of 2024
A Mabeya, J
March 13, 2025
Between
Clifford Otieno Obiero t/a C Obiero & Associate Advocates
Applicant
and
County Secretary, County Government of Kisumu
1st Respondent
CEC Finance, County Government of Kisumu
2nd Respondent
County Government of Kisumu
3rd Respondent
Ruling
1. I have considered the Motion dated 18th September, 2024 together with the Supporting affidavit of Clifford Otieno Obiero sworn on even date.
2. I have seen the Certificate of Costs dated 5th August, 2024. There is no evidence that the same has either been varied or set aside.
3. Accordingly, I enter judgment in favor of the applicant as prayed.
4. File closed.It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025. A. MABEYA, FCI ArbJUDGE