[2022] KEELC 19 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant's application to withdraw the appeal was merited, as the parties had settled the matter out of court and there was no objection from the respondent. The withdrawal was consistent with the constitutional and statutory mandate to encourage alternative dispute resolution and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 19 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Benard Otieno Obunga; Respondent: Lawrence Oguda Obunga
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 31 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Withdrawal of Appeal Before Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal withdrawn by consent; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- GMA Ongondo
- Legal Topics
- Ownership Dispute, Withdrawal of Appeal, Out of Court Settlement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benard Otieno Obunga
Appellant
Lawrence Oguda Obunga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Withdrawal of Appeal Before Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn following an out of court settlement.
- 2 Whether any orders as to costs should be made upon withdrawal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant's application to withdraw the appeal was merited, as the parties had settled the matter out of court and there was no objection from the respondent. The withdrawal was consistent with the constitutional and statutory mandate to encourage alternative dispute resolution and facilitate the efficient disposal of cases. Consequently, the appeal was allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal withdrawn by consent; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The appellant's withdrawal of the appeal is allowed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Obunga v Obunga (Environment and Land Appeal 31 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 19 (KLR) (27 April 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 19 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Environment and Land Appeal 31 of 2021
GMA Ongondo, J
April 27, 2022
Between
Benard Otieno Obunga
Appellant
and
Lawrence Oguda Obunga
Respondent
(Being an appeal from the ruling and orders of the Chief Magistrate Court at Homa-Bay law Courts (Hon. Maloba) delivered on the 25th day of September 2018 in land Case No. 6 of 2016)
Ruling
1. The appellant, Benard Otieno Obunga through the firm of Nyauke and company Advocates commenced the instant appeal by way of a Memorandum of appeal dated 25th March 2019 and lodged in court on even date. The same is anchored on the following grounds;a.The learned trial Magistrate erred in law and fact by finding that the plaintiff is the rightful proprietor of land parcel number East Kanyada/Kanyadier/3465. b.The learned trial Magistrate erred in law and fact in dismissing the plausible defence of the appellant and holding that the plaintiff proved his case on a balance of probability.c.The learned trial magistrate erred in fact by awarding the plaintiff general damages.
2. Wherefore, he prays that:a.This appeal be allowed and the orders of R.B.N Maloba (SRM) issued on 25th September, 2018, be set aside.b.Costs of this appeal and for the main suit be awarded to the appellant.
3. Mr. Owade learned Counsel for the respondent is aware of this date. He was in court on 2nd February 2022 when the parties through their respective counsel requested time to confirm the status of the proposed settlement. Today, the said counsel is absent without any reason.
4. Ms Odera learned counsel for the appellant has informed this court that the matter has been settled out of court. Therefore, she has sought to withdraw the appeal with no orders as to costs.
5. The application for the withdrawal of this appeal is made in the spirit of Article 159 (2) (b) and (c) of the Constitutionof Kenya, 2010 and section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2015 (2011).
6. In the premises, I find that the appellant’s prayer has merit.
7. The net effect is that I hereby allow the appellant’s withdrawal of this appeal with no order as to costs.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT HOMA-BAY THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2022. G.M.A ONG’ONDOJUDGEPresent:a) Ms Odera, learned counsel for the appellant.b) Terrence, Court Assistant.