[2010] KEHC 1057 (KLR)
The court found that the children, being of young and tender age, should remain in the custody of their mother (the respondent) pending the determination of the divorce cause, as the petitioner had not advanced any sufficient grounds to warrant removal of custody from the respondent. The court further determined that the petitioner had not been contributing a fair share to the financial upkeep of the children and that the respondent had borne a disproportionate burden since separation. Considering the needs of the children and the financial circumstances of the parties, the court ordered the petitioner to pay Kshs.75,000/- per month for maintenance and education of the children, effective...
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 1057 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: O.C.A; Respondent: E. O
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2010
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 85 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Interlocutory Application for Custody and Maintenance Pending Divorce
- Outcome
- Application allowed.
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Child Custody, Child Maintenance, Alimony Pending Suit, Access and Visitation, Financial Responsibility of Parents
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O.C.A
Petitioner
E. O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Interlocutory Application for Custody and Maintenance Pending Divorce
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is entitled to the custody of the children of the marriage pending the determination of the divorce cause.
- 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to maintenance and financial support for the children and herself beyond the amount currently paid by the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the children, being of young and tender age, should remain in the custody of their mother (the respondent) pending the determination of the divorce cause, as the petitioner had not advanced any sufficient grounds to warrant removal of custody from the respondent. The court further determined that the petitioner had not been contributing a fair share to the financial upkeep of the children and that the respondent had borne a disproportionate burden since separation. Considering the needs of the children and the financial circumstances of the parties, the court ordered the petitioner to pay Kshs.75,000/- per month for maintenance and education of the children, effective...
Court Disposition
Application allowed.
Orders
- The respondent is granted custody of the children pending the hearing and determination of the divorce cause.
- The petitioner is granted access to the children during weekends pursuant to a timetable to be agreed between the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment