[2024] KEELRC 2436 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 2436 (KLR)

The court found that the factual and legal circumstances of the present petition were identical to those in Petition E013 of 2021, where the 1st Respondent was found to have violated the constitutional and statutory rights of the affected employees by paying them salaries inconsistent with the structure approved by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 2436 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Memba Ocharo; Respondent: Anti – Female Genital Mutilation Board; Respondent: State Corporations Advisory Committee; Respondent: The Attorney-General; Interested Party: Salaries and Remuneration Commission; Interested Party: Peter Njage; Interested Party: Elias Dulo; Interested Party: George Mogusu; Interested Party: Christopher Peter; Interested Party: Moses Maingi; Interested Party: John Mbugua; Interested Party: Josephat Ireri; Interested Party: Salome Mutiga; Interested Party: Teresia Mbaru; Interested Party: Tom Sirawa; Interested Party: Leah Maingi; Interested Party: Shem Owala; Interested Party: Ann Muthingani; Interested Party: Martha Wanjuki; Interested Party: Nixon Daria; Interested Party: Fred Owiti; Interested Party: Everlyne Musyoka; Interested Party: Paul Sirma; Interested Party: Jane Mwereru; Interested Party: Christabel Adhiambo; Interested Party: Julius Musau
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E189 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unlawful Remuneration, Violation of Fair Administrative Action, Discrimination in Employment, Constitutional Rights in Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Unlawful Remuneration Violation of Fair Administrative Action Discrimination in Employment Constitutional Rights in Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Memba Ocharo

Applicant

Anti – Female Genital Mutilation Board

Respondent

State Corporations Advisory Committee

Respondent

The Attorney-General

Respondent

Salaries and Remuneration Commission

Interested Party

Peter Njage

Interested Party

Elias Dulo

Interested Party

George Mogusu

Interested Party

Christopher Peter

Interested Party

Moses Maingi

Interested Party

John Mbugua

Interested Party

Josephat Ireri

Interested Party

Salome Mutiga

Interested Party

Teresia Mbaru

Interested Party

Tom Sirawa

Interested Party

Leah Maingi

Interested Party

Shem Owala

Interested Party

Ann Muthingani

Interested Party

Martha Wanjuki

Interested Party

Nixon Daria

Interested Party

Fred Owiti

Interested Party

Everlyne Musyoka

Interested Party

Paul Sirma

Interested Party

Jane Mwereru

Interested Party

Christabel Adhiambo

Interested Party

Julius Musau

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Respondent violated the constitutional and statutory rights of the 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties in relation to remuneration and employment terms.
  2. 2 Whether the findings of the Commission on Administrative Justice and the judgment in Petition E013 of 2021 should be adopted in this petition.
  3. 3 Whether the 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties are entitled to salary arrears, general damages, costs, and interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the factual and legal circumstances of the present petition were identical to those in Petition E013 of 2021, where the 1st Respondent was found to have violated the constitutional and statutory rights of the affected employees by paying them salaries inconsistent with the structure approved by the Salaries and Remuneration Commission. The court adopted the findings of the Commission on Administrative Justice and the previous judgment, holding that the 2nd to 22nd Interested Parties were entitled to the difference in salary, general damages for violation of their rights, costs, and interest. The court emphasized that there was no justification to depart from the...

Court Disposition

petition allowed

Orders

  • Judgment in Petition Number E013 of 2021 is adopted as the judgment in Petition E189 of 2023.
  • Findings of the Commission on Administrative Justice in Inquiry File FGM/012/423/2018 are adopted as the findings of the court.