[2023] KEELRC 1806 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1806 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant and respondent entered into a binding employment contract upon the claimant's acceptance of the letter of appointment. The respondent's subsequent rescission of the offer, based on unsubstantiated security clearance concerns and without affording the claimant an opportunity to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1806 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Walter Omondi Ochieng; Respondent: Jambojet Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 555 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant in part
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Termination, Employment Contracts, Security Clearance, Remedies for Unlawful Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constructive Dismissal Unfair Termination Employment Contracts Security Clearance Remedies for Unlawful Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Walter Omondi Ochieng

Applicant

Jambojet Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the rescission of the claimant's employment by the respondent constituted unfair termination under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation and other remedies for the respondent's failure to deploy him after issuing a letter of appointment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant and respondent entered into a binding employment contract upon the claimant's acceptance of the letter of appointment. The respondent's subsequent rescission of the offer, based on unsubstantiated security clearance concerns and without affording the claimant an opportunity to respond, breached the requirements of fair procedure. The respondent's failure to follow best practice by issuing the appointment letter before completing background checks was a procedural lapse for which it bore responsibility. The court held that the rescission amounted to unfair termination under Section 45 of the Employment Act. However, the claimant's compensation was limited...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant in part

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant three months' salary in compensation for unfair termination (Kshs. 1,269,000).
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant two months' salary in lieu of notice (Kshs. 846,000).