[2023] KEELC 20451 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 20451 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants are decree holders of a judgment and decree that remain unsettled by the respondents. The respondents' grounds, including the pendency of an appeal and the need for budgetary allocation, do not preclude the grant of leave to apply for judicial review. The court noted that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 20451 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Amina Achieng’ Ochieng’; Applicant: Tilapia Beach Resort Limited; Respondent: Managing Director, Kenya Railways Corporation; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry Of Interior And Coordination National Government; Respondent: Chief Finance Officer, County Government Of Kisumu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Judicial Review Case E001 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Order of Mandamus
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for judicial review order of mandamus; costs to abide the substantive proceedings.
Judges
E Asati
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Mandamus Orders, Enforcement of Court Orders, Public Body Liability
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Land and Property Judicial Review Mandamus Orders Enforcement of Court Orders Public Body Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amina Achieng’ Ochieng’

Applicant

Tilapia Beach Resort Limited

Applicant

Managing Director, Kenya Railways Corporation

Respondent

Principal Secretary, Ministry Of Interior And Coordination National Government

Respondent

Chief Finance Officer, County Government Of Kisumu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Order of Mandamus

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to leave to apply for an order of mandamus to compel payment of a judgment debt by the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents' pending appeal and budgetary process preclude the grant of leave for judicial review.
  3. 3 Whether the application satisfies the requirements under Order 53 for grant of leave for judicial review proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants are decree holders of a judgment and decree that remain unsettled by the respondents. The respondents' grounds, including the pendency of an appeal and the need for budgetary allocation, do not preclude the grant of leave to apply for judicial review. The court noted that the order of stay of execution had lapsed due to non-compliance by the respondents with its conditions. The application met the threshold under Order 53 for the grant of leave, as it was neither frivolous nor vexatious and raised arguable issues suitable for judicial review. Accordingly, the court granted leave to the applicants to apply for an order of mandamus to compel the...

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for judicial review order of mandamus; costs to abide the substantive proceedings.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to apply for judicial review order of mandamus to compel the respondents to pay the sum of KES 76,873,366 plus costs and interest at court rates, totaling KES 117,233,983 as at July 17, 2023, as awarded in the judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court delivered on...
  • The substantive application to be filed and served within 21 days.