[2024] KEHC 7667 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 7667 (KLR)

The court found that public participation had in fact been conducted in the process of establishing the Asumbi town sub-location, as evidenced by the petitioners' own correspondence and the record. The right to public participation does not require unanimity or that all views be accepted, but rather that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 7667 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Caleb Onyango Ochieng; Applicant: Kepha Otieno Odongo; Respondent: Ministry of Interior and Coordination Of National Government; Respondent: Prof Kithure Kindiki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition E002 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Petition and Interlocutory Application
Outcome
petition dismissed
Judges
KW Kiarie
Legal Topics
Public Participation, Administrative Units Creation, Legitimate Expectations, Constitutional Rights, Judicial Review
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Public Participation Administrative Units Creation Legitimate Expectations Constitutional Rights Judicial Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Caleb Onyango Ochieng

Applicant

Kepha Otieno Odongo

Applicant

Ministry of Interior and Coordination Of National Government

Respondent

Prof Kithure Kindiki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Petition and Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the establishment of Asumbi town sub-location was done in violation of the constitutional requirement for public participation.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents failed to comply with Article 10 of the Constitution and Section 4 of the National Government Coordination Act in creating the sub-location.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioners are entitled to conservatory orders staying the implementation of Gazette Notice No. 17 of February 2024.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that public participation had in fact been conducted in the process of establishing the Asumbi town sub-location, as evidenced by the petitioners' own correspondence and the record. The right to public participation does not require unanimity or that all views be accepted, but rather that stakeholders are given an opportunity to be heard. The petitioners failed to demonstrate that the respondents violated Article 10 of the Constitution or Section 4 of the National Government Coordination Act. The threshold for granting conservatory orders was not met, as there was no prima facie case or real danger of constitutional violation. Consequently, the orders sought could not be...

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition is dismissed.
  • Each party will bear its own costs.