[2023] KEHC 3158 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 3158 (KLR)

The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing, as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant was arrested on August 14, 2013, arraigned on September 4, 2013, and denied bail on November 26, 2014. The sentence of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 3158 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kevin Ochieng Ochieng; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E094 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Recalculation Application
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentencing Principles, Custodial Period Credit, Manslaughter, Penal Code Section 333 2
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Principles Custodial Period Credit Manslaughter Penal Code Section 333 2

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Ochieng Ochieng

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Recalculation Application

  1. 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in computing the applicant's sentence as per Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to have his sentence recalculated from the date of arrest.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing, as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant was arrested on August 14, 2013, arraigned on September 4, 2013, and denied bail on November 26, 2014. The sentence of fifteen years' imprisonment was imposed on May 24, 2017, without accounting for the pre-sentence custodial period. The High Court held that the sentence should be recalculated to run from the date of arrest, August 14, 2013, thereby giving effect to the statutory requirement and ensuring the applicant receives credit for time already served.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The fifteen (15) years imprisonment imposed on the applicant shall be calculated from August 14, 2013, the date of arrest.
  • Signal to issue.