[2023] KEHC 3282 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had spent eight months in custody prior to being sentenced for robbery with violence. In accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court held that this period must be taken into account when computing the applicant's sentence. The court noted that prior to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3282 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Erick Otieno Ochieng; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E016 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Pre Sentence Custody Period
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Pre Sentence Custody, Robbery With Violence, Death Sentence Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erick Otieno Ochieng
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Pre Sentence Custody Period
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in computing the applicant's sentence as per Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the eight months spent in custody deducted from his twenty-year sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had spent eight months in custody prior to being sentenced for robbery with violence. In accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court held that this period must be taken into account when computing the applicant's sentence. The court noted that prior to 2010, capital offences such as robbery with violence were not bailable, and thus the applicant could not have been released on bail. The court was satisfied that the application was merited and ordered that the applicant's twenty-year sentence, as reviewed by the High Court, should be calculated from the date of conviction, less the eight months spent in pre-sentence custody.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The twenty (20) years imprisonment as reviewed by the High Court vide Kisumu HCRA No 104 of 2010 on November 6, 2012 shall be calculated taking into account the eight (8) months that the convict herein spent in custody prior to being sentenced on July 2, 2010.
- Order to be extracted and served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Ochieng v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E016 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3282 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3282 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E016 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
April 12, 2023
Between
Erick Otieno Ochieng
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This Miscellaneous Criminal Application was filed on January 25, 2022 by Eric Otieno Ochieng, a Convict in Nyando Senior Principal Magistrate’s Criminal No 600 of 2009, wherein he was charged with the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code and sentenced to suffer death.
2. He deposes in his affidavit that he appealed to the High Court vid HCRA No 104 of 2010 at Kisumu where his sentence was reduced to twenty (20) years imprisonment.
3. He now seeks that this court considers period already spent in custody before he was sentenced to death. He annexed the warrant of commitment to prison for imprisonment dated 2nd July 2010.
4. Although this court called for the lower court file, for over one year, the same has never been availed from Nyando Law Courts.
5. Nonetheless, the warrant of committal to prison is clear on the offence convicted of and date of conviction and sentence.
6. I however take judicial notice of the fact that before 2010, capital offences such as murder and robbery with violence were not bailable.
7. The applicant herein deposes that he was in custody for eight (8) months prior to his sentence hence the said period be taken into account as part of his sentence in accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
8. I have considered the application filed on January 25, 2022. I am satisfied that the same is merited. I allow it and order that the twenty (20) years imprisonment as reviewed by the High Court vide Kisumu HCRA No 104 of 2010 on November 6, 2012 shall be calculated taking into account the eight (8) months that the convict herein spent in custody prior to being sentenced on July 2, 2010.
9. Order to be extracted and served.
10. This file is closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023. R. E. ABURILIJUDGE