[2021] KEELC 3598 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3598 (KLR)

The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to order investigations into the transfer of land parcels after it has already rendered judgment on the matter. The applicant, not being a party to the suit, has no locus standi to seek the orders requested. The court emphasized that its orders must be respected and cannot...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3598 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: OCS Serem; Plaintiff: Patrick Malongo Lidovolo; Defendant: Luice Asang’asa; Defendant: Acton Musii Khalambukha; Defendant: Sabeti Khalambukha
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 78 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Investigation Orders
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Jurisdiction of Court, Investigation of Land Transfer, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Jurisdiction of Court Investigation of Land Transfer Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

OCS Serem

Applicant

Patrick Malongo Lidovolo

Plaintiff

Luice Asang’asa

Defendant

Acton Musii Khalambukha

Defendant

Sabeti Khalambukha

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Investigation Orders

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order investigations into the transfer of land after judgment has been rendered.
  2. 2 Whether the orders of eviction previously issued should be stayed pending investigations.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has locus standi to seek the orders requested.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to order investigations into the transfer of land parcels after it has already rendered judgment on the matter. The applicant, not being a party to the suit, has no locus standi to seek the orders requested. The court emphasized that its orders must be respected and cannot be rendered in vain. Since no appeal was filed within the stipulated time and no leave to appeal out of time was granted, the judgment stands. The application was found to be frivolous, an abuse of the court process, and without merit, leading to its dismissal.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 18th January 2021 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to investigations or stay are granted.