[2022] KEELRC 13137 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 13137 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not established a prima facie case for the grant of the orders sought. The applicant admitted non-compliance with the transfer order and only provided explanations for his actions. The court noted that there were disputed facts regarding whether the applicant had reported to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13137 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hesbon Dianga Odep; Respondent: County Government of Migori; Respondent: Migori County Public Service Board; Respondent: County Secretary, Migori County Government; Respondent: Chief Officer, Medical Services, Migori County Government; Respondent: Director of Medical Services, Migori County Government; Respondent: County Attorney
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E039 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Motion for Reinstatement to Payroll and Suspension of Transfer Order
Outcome
motion dismissed
Judges
S Radido
Legal Topics
Salary Withholding, Employee Transfer, Interlocutory Injunctions, Prima Facie Case, Public Service Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Salary Withholding Employee Transfer Interlocutory Injunctions Prima Facie Case Public Service Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hesbon Dianga Odep

Applicant

County Government of Migori

Respondent

Migori County Public Service Board

Respondent

County Secretary, Migori County Government

Respondent

Chief Officer, Medical Services, Migori County Government

Respondent

Director of Medical Services, Migori County Government

Respondent

County Attorney

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Motion for Reinstatement to Payroll and Suspension of Transfer Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant established a prima facie case for reinstatement to the payroll pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order suspending the implementation of the posting/transfer order dated 14th July 2021.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not established a prima facie case for the grant of the orders sought. The applicant admitted non-compliance with the transfer order and only provided explanations for his actions. The court noted that there were disputed facts regarding whether the applicant had reported to work at the new station, which could not be resolved at the interlocutory stage. Applying the standard tests for interlocutory relief—prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience, and delay in seeking relief—the court concluded that the applicant did not meet the threshold for the grant of the orders. Consequently, the motion was dismissed and the matter directed to...

Court Disposition

motion dismissed

Orders

  • The motion dated 19 September 2022 is dismissed with costs in the cause.
  • The cause should be progressed to a hearing on the merits.