[2024] KEHC 769 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 769 (KLR)

The appellants failed to comply with the court's explicit directions to file and serve the record of appeal and written submissions within the prescribed period, despite being duly served with the orders. The court found no record of appeal or submissions filed or served, and the appellants were absent at the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 769 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Leonard Odhiambo Odero; Appellant: Andrew Mukele Otuchi; Appellant: Paul Waititu Ndungu; Respondent: Paulus Ouma Nyambutue
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E015 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Compliance With Court Directions and Dismissal for Non Compliance
Outcome
appeal dismissed for non-compliance with court directions
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Appeal Dismissal, Non Compliance With Court Orders, Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Dismissal Non Compliance With Court Orders Stay of Execution Security for Due Performance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Odhiambo Odero

Appellant

Andrew Mukele Otuchi

Appellant

Paul Waititu Ndungu

Appellant

Paulus Ouma Nyambutue

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Compliance With Court Directions and Dismissal for Non Compliance

  1. 1 Whether the appellants complied with the court's directions to file and serve the record of appeal and submissions within the stipulated timelines.
  2. 2 Whether non-compliance with court directions warrants dismissal of the appeal and vacation of stay orders.
  3. 3 Whether the security deposited as a bank guarantee should be released to the respondent upon dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants failed to comply with the court's explicit directions to file and serve the record of appeal and written submissions within the prescribed period, despite being duly served with the orders. The court found no record of appeal or submissions filed or served, and the appellants were absent at the mention. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for non-compliance, vacated the conditional stay of execution, and ordered the release of the bank guarantee amount to the respondent's advocate. The court further directed that each party bear their own costs, emphasizing the importance of adherence to procedural timelines and court orders in appellate proceedings.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for non-compliance with court directions

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for non-compliance with court directions served on 5th December 2023.
  • The conditional stay of execution orders granted by this court are vacated.