[2024] KEHC 8171 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 8171 (KLR)

The court found that the notice of withdrawal filed by the applicant was not effective because it was neither endorsed by the court nor made by consent of the parties. Consequently, the application remains pending, and the court issued directions for service, filing of responses, and further affidavits or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 8171 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benard Omondi Odhiambo; Applicant: Dickens Omondi Ogutu; Applicant: Vincent Owino Lumumba t/a Bedvin Investments; Respondent: The Chairman Board of Management Ahero Girls Secondary School
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E001 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Preliminary Application and Directions
Outcome
Directions issued for service, responses, and further filings; application not certified as urgent.
Judges
MS Shariff
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Service of Process, Filing of Affidavits, Court Directions
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Withdrawal of Application Service of Process Filing of Affidavits Court Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benard Omondi Odhiambo

Applicant

Dickens Omondi Ogutu

Applicant

Vincent Owino Lumumba t/a Bedvin Investments

Applicant

The Chairman Board of Management Ahero Girls Secondary School

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Preliminary Application and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the notice of withdrawal filed by the applicant was valid without court endorsement or consent of the parties.
  2. 2 What directions should be issued regarding service, responses, and further filings in the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the notice of withdrawal filed by the applicant was not effective because it was neither endorsed by the court nor made by consent of the parties. Consequently, the application remains pending, and the court issued directions for service, filing of responses, and further affidavits or submissions. The court also set a mention date to confirm compliance with these directions.

Court Disposition

Directions issued for service, responses, and further filings; application not certified as urgent.

Orders

  • This application is not certified as urgent.
  • The application to be served within 2 days from the date hereof.