[2025] KEHC 6724 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 6724 (KLR)

The court found that since the applicants had filed a notice of withdrawal of their application for stay and review before the ruling was delivered, the application stood withdrawn. Given that the respondent had already filed a preliminary objection and written submissions in response to the application, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 6724 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hillary Odhiambo; Applicant: George Otieno; Respondent: Beatrice Aoko Otieno
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E014 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application (withdrawal of Application for Stay and Review)
Outcome
Application marked as withdrawn; costs awarded to the respondent.
Judges
A. Ong’injo
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Review of Orders, Withdrawal of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Review of Orders Withdrawal of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hillary Odhiambo

Applicant

George Otieno

Applicant

Beatrice Aoko Otieno

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Interlocutory Application (withdrawal of Application for Stay and Review)

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution and review should be entertained after the applicants filed a notice of withdrawal.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to costs upon withdrawal of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the applicants had filed a notice of withdrawal of their application for stay and review before the ruling was delivered, the application stood withdrawn. Given that the respondent had already filed a preliminary objection and written submissions in response to the application, the court exercised its discretion to award costs of the withdrawn application to the respondent. The withdrawal rendered the substantive issues in the application moot, and no further orders were necessary except for costs.

Court Disposition

Application marked as withdrawn; costs awarded to the respondent.

Orders

  • The application dated 20th November 2024 is marked as withdrawn.
  • The respondent is awarded costs of the withdrawn application.