[2022] KEHC 15088 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 15088 (KLR)

The court held that Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code does not apply to convicts serving life imprisonment following commutation from a death sentence. The applicant is not serving a term sentence but a life sentence imposed by the Court of Appeal, and therefore, the period spent in custody prior to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 15088 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Henry Collins Odhiambo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E040 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Resentencing
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Resentencing, Life Imprisonment, Death Sentence Commutation, Time Spent in Custody, Criminal Procedure Code Section 333 2
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Resentencing Life Imprisonment Death Sentence Commutation Time Spent in Custody Criminal Procedure Code Section 333 2

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Henry Collins Odhiambo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Resentencing

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody during trial considered in his sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code applies to a convict serving a life sentence after commutation from a death sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code does not apply to convicts serving life imprisonment following commutation from a death sentence. The applicant is not serving a term sentence but a life sentence imposed by the Court of Appeal, and therefore, the period spent in custody prior to sentencing cannot be considered for reduction of sentence under the cited provision. The application was found to be without merit and was dismissed accordingly.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for resentencing is declined and dismissed.
  • File closed.