[2023] KEHC 27489 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 27489 (KLR)

The court found that, upon perusal of the applicant's notice of motion and supporting affidavit, there was no legal or factual basis to warrant a review of the conviction and sentence. The application was therefore disallowed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 27489 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Moses Otieno Odhiambo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E040 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
Outcome
application disallowed
Judges
MS Shariff
Legal Topics
Review of Conviction, Review of Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Review of Conviction Review of Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Otieno Odhiambo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether there is a basis for review of the applicant's conviction and sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, upon perusal of the applicant's notice of motion and supporting affidavit, there was no legal or factual basis to warrant a review of the conviction and sentence. The application was therefore disallowed.

Court Disposition

application disallowed

Orders

  • The application for review of conviction and sentence is disallowed.