[2023] KEELRC 855 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 855 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st Respondent had substantially complied with the court order of July 27, 2022 regarding payment of salaries to the Claimants, as evidenced by affidavits and supporting documentation. The Claimants themselves admitted partial compliance, acknowledging receipt of salaries except for June...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 855 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Peter Odima; Plaintiff: Francis Madegwa; Respondent: General Secretary Kenya National Private Security Workers Union; Respondent: Registrar of Trade Unions
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E011 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications (contempt and Salary Arrears)
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
MA Onyango
Legal Topics
Salary Arrears, Contempt of Court, Union Governance, Suspension Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Salary Arrears Contempt of Court Union Governance Suspension Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Odima

Plaintiff

Francis Madegwa

Plaintiff

General Secretary Kenya National Private Security Workers Union

Respondent

Registrar of Trade Unions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications (contempt and Salary Arrears)

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Respondent is in breach of court orders issued on July 27, 2022 for payment of salary arrears to the Claimants.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st Respondent should be cited for contempt of court for alleged non-compliance with the said orders.
  3. 3 Whether the suspensions of the Claimants and payment of half salaries were lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st Respondent had substantially complied with the court order of July 27, 2022 regarding payment of salaries to the Claimants, as evidenced by affidavits and supporting documentation. The Claimants themselves admitted partial compliance, acknowledging receipt of salaries except for June 2022 and noting that they were on half salary following suspension. The court held that no credible evidence was adduced to prove deliberate disobedience of the court's order, and therefore, the threshold for contempt was not met. The court dismissed the contempt application and directed that the main suit be set down for hearing on a priority basis to avoid further delay.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated January 31, 2023 is dismissed with no order as to costs.
  • The main suit is to be set down for hearing on a priority basis within the next 30 days.