[2022] KESC 52 (KLR)
The Supreme Court held that Rule 17A(4) of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017, expressly prohibits the joinder of any person as an interested party in a presidential election petition. The applicant failed to demonstrate any specific prejudice he would suffer if not enjoined, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KESC 52 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Raila Odinga; Applicant: Martha Wangari Karua; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Wanyonyi Wafula Chebukati; Respondent: Boya Molu; Respondent: Prof. Abdi Yakub Guliye; Respondent: Juliana Whonge Cherera; Respondent: Justus Nyangaya; Respondent: Francis Wanderi; Respondent: Irene Massit; Respondent: William Samoei Ruto; Applicant: David Mwaure Waihiga
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Court Station
- Supreme Court of Kenya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Presidential Election Petition E005 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Presidential Election Petition / Application for Joinder as Interested Party
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- MK Koome, PM Mwilu, MK Ibrahim, SC Wanjala, NS Ndungu, I Lenaola, W Ouko
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Interested Party Status, Presidential Election Petition Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raila Odinga
Applicant
Martha Wangari Karua
Applicant
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Wanyonyi Wafula Chebukati
Respondent
Boya Molu
Respondent
Prof. Abdi Yakub Guliye
Respondent
Juliana Whonge Cherera
Respondent
Justus Nyangaya
Respondent
Francis Wanderi
Respondent
Irene Massit
Respondent
William Samoei Ruto
Respondent
David Mwaure Waihiga
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Presidential Election Petition / Application for Joinder as Interested Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person can be enjoined as an interested party in a presidential election petition under the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that Rule 17A(4) of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017, expressly prohibits the joinder of any person as an interested party in a presidential election petition. The applicant failed to demonstrate any specific prejudice he would suffer if not enjoined, and the arguments he sought to advance could be adequately presented by the existing parties to the petition. The court emphasized that the legal framework governing presidential election petitions is strict and does not permit the expansion of parties beyond those expressly allowed by the rules. Accordingly, the application for joinder was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated August 26, 2022 and filed on August 27, 2022 seeking joinder of David Waihiga Mwaure as interested party to this petition is hereby dismissed.
- There shall be no orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
57 paragraphs
Odinga & another v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 8 others; Waihiga (Intended Interested Party) (Presidential Election Petition E005 of 2022) [2022] KESC 52 (KLR) (29 August 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KESC 52 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Supreme Court of Kenya
Presidential Election Petition E005 of 2022
MK Koome, CJ & P, PM Mwilu, DCJ & V-P, MK Ibrahim, SC Wanjala, NS Ndungu, I Lenaola & W Ouko, SCJJ
August 29, 2022
Between
Raila Odinga
1st Petitioner
Martha Wangari Karua
2nd Petitioner
and
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
1st Respondent
Wanyonyi Wafula Chebukati
2nd Respondent
Boya Molu
3rd Respondent
Prof.Abdi Yakub Guliye
4th Respondent
Juliana Whonge Cherera
5th Respondent
Justus Nyangaya
6th Respondent
Francis Wanderi
7th Respondent
Irene Massit
8th Respondent
William Samoei Ruto
9th Respondent
and
David Mwaure Waihiga
Intended Interested Party
(Being an application by David Mwaure Waihiga to be enjoined as an interested Party)
No person may be joined as an interested party in a presidential election petition
The applicant sought to be joined as an interested party in the presidential election petition. The court pointed out that rule 17A(4) of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules 2017, provided that an application by any person as an interested party would not be allowed in a presidential election petition. The court further held that none of the intended interested party’s averments demonstrated the prejudice he would suffer if he was not enjoined and that the arguments the applicant proposed to make could be adequately argued by other parties in the petition.
Reported by Kakai Toili
Electoral Law- election petitions - presidential election petitions - parties in presidential election petitions - interested parties - whether one could be enjoined as an interested party in a presidential election petition - Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017, rule 17A(4).
Brief facts The applicant filed the instant application seeking joinder as an interested party. The applicant was one of the four presidential candidates in the presidential election held on August 9, 2022 under the Agano Party Ticket. The applicant argued that he actively participated in the elections from the point of campaigns, casting of ballots, tallying and counting of ballot papers, up to the declaration at Bomas of Kenya and that the court needed to take his evidence into account to ensure that the final judgment of the court was based on available evidence.
Issues Whether one could be enjoined as an interested party in a presidential election petition.
Held
Rule 17A(4) of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules 2017, provided that an application by any person as an interested party would not be allowed in a presidential election petition. None of the intended interested party’s averments demonstrated the prejudice he would suffer if he was not enjoined. The arguments the applicant proposed to make could be adequately argued by other parties in the petition.
Application dismissed.
Orders No orders as to costs.
Citations CasesNone referred toStatutesKenyaSupreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules, 2017 (Act No 7 of 2011 Sub Leg) rules 2, 17, 17A(4) - (Interpreted)AdvocatesNone mentioned
Ruling
1. Upon perusing the notice of motion dated August 26, 2022 and filed on August 27, 2022, pursuant to rule 2 and 17 of the Supreme Court (Presidential Petition) Rules 2017, seeking joinder of David Waihiga, the party leader of Agano Party as interested party; and
2. Upon reading the supporting affidavit of Mr David Waihiga Mwaure, the party leader of Agano Party sworn on August 26, 2022; and
3. Upon perusing the grounds adduced by the applicant in support of the orders to be enjoined as interested party that is, he was one of the four presidential candidates in the presidential election held on August 9, 2022 under the Agano Party Ticket; he actively participated in the said elections from the point of campaigns, casting of ballots, tallying and counting of ballot papers, up to the declaration at Bomas of Kenya; and the court needs to take his evidence into account to ensure that the final judgment of the court is based on available evidence; and
4. Noting that no party has filed a response to the application; and
5. Considering the provisions of rule 17A (4) of the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition) Rules 2017, which provide that an application by any person as an interested party shall not be allowed in a presidential election petition.
6. Furthermore, none of the intended interested party’s averments demonstrate the prejudice he will suffer if he was not enjoined. It is also our finding, that the arguments he proposes to make can be adequately argued by other parties in the petition.
7. For the foregoing reasons, the final orders of the court are as follows:
Orders:a.The application dated August 26, 2022 and filed on August 27, 2022 seeking joinder of David Waihiga Mwaure as interested party to this petition is hereby dismissed.b.There shall be no orders as to costs.
8. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022. ....................................................................M.K KOOMECHIEF JUSTICE & PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT......................................................................P.M MWILUDEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE & DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.....................................................................M.K IBRAHIMJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME...................................................................S.C. WANJALAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME......................................................................NJOKI NDUNGUJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT....................................................................I. LENAOLAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT....................................................................W. OUKOJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURTI certify that this is a true copy of the originalRegistrar Supreme Court of Kenya