[2022] KEHC 16837 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16837 (KLR)

The court declined to revise the sentence because the applicants were sentenced to serve 5 years imprisonment for manslaughter, and the presentence report did not support a non-custodial sentence. Furthermore, as the sentence to be served exceeds 3 years, the court found no basis to interfere with the sentence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16837 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Julius Odhiambo Oduor; Applicant: Erick Ochieng Onyango; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E101 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application for sentence revision declined
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Manslaughter, Non Custodial Sentence, Imprisonment Terms
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Manslaughter Non Custodial Sentence Imprisonment Terms

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julius Odhiambo Oduor

Applicant

Erick Ochieng Onyango

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 5 years imprisonment for manslaughter should be revised to a non-custodial sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to revise the sentence because the applicants were sentenced to serve 5 years imprisonment for manslaughter, and the presentence report did not support a non-custodial sentence. Furthermore, as the sentence to be served exceeds 3 years, the court found no basis to interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court. The application for sentence revision was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application for sentence revision declined

Orders

  • Application for sentence revision is declined.
  • File closed.