[2023] KEHC 25749 (KLR)
The court found that, given the applicant's ill health, the absence of opposition from the prosecution, and the fact that the applicant had already served a substantial part of his sentence, it was appropriate to revise the sentence. The court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction under section 362 of the Criminal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 25749 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Calvin Otieno Ogalo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kibera
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E003 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Revision
- Outcome
- application allowed; sentence revised; applicant released
- Judges
- DR Kavedza
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Revision, Narcotic Offences, Non Custodial Sentences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Calvin Otieno Ogalo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Sentence Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a revision of his custodial sentence to a non-custodial sentence due to ill health and time already served.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was proper in light of the applicant's circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, given the applicant's ill health, the absence of opposition from the prosecution, and the fact that the applicant had already served a substantial part of his sentence, it was appropriate to revise the sentence. The court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction under section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code, set aside the original sentence, and substituted it with an order that the sentence already served was sufficient. The applicant was ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
application allowed; sentence revised; applicant released
Orders
- The sentence imposed by the trial court is set aside and substituted with an order that the sentence served is sufficient.
- The applicant shall be released forthwith unless lawfully held for any other reason.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Ogalo v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E003 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 25749 (KLR) (27 November 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 25749 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kibera
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E003 of 2023
DR Kavedza, J
November 27, 2023
Between
Calvin Otieno Ogalo
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant was charged, convicted and sentenced to serve seven (7) years imprisonment and a fine of Kshs. 2 million, in default, to serve one (1) year imprisonment for the offence of trafficking in narcotic drugs contrary to section 4(a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances (Control) Act No. 4 of 1994.
2. The applicant has now filed a Notice of Motion application dated 6th October, 2023 seeking revision of his sentence. He avers that he is ailing and that his continued incarceration will significantly affect his wellbeing and that of his dependants who look upon his for sustenance and providence. He thus prays for a non-custodial sentence for the remaining term of his sentence. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the applicant in which he reiterates the said grounds.
3. The application was canvassed by way of oral submissions. Counsel for the applicant urged that the applicant has served a substantial part of his sentence being 3½ years and has a balance of about 2 years. He therefore prayed for the court to allow the application.
4. The State through Mr Mutuma conceded that the applicant has served a substantial part of his sentence and has a remainder of less than 3 years. Therefore, he did not oppose the appeal.
5. The application invokes the revisionary jurisdiction of this court which is donated by section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code which reads as follows:“…The High Court may call for and examine the record of any criminal proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of any such subordinate court.”
6. I have considered the application and the grounds in support of the same. The applicant has averred that he is sickly and his health continues to deteriorate due to incarceration. He thus prays for a non-custodial sentence so as to obviate any further insidious deterioration of his health.
7. There being no objection from the prosecution and considering that the applicant has served a substantial part of his sentence, the application is allowed.
8. Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the trial court is hereby set aside and substituted with an order that the sentence served is sufficient. The applicant shall be released forthwith unless he is lawfully held for any other reason.
9. It is so ordered.
RULING DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023. _____________________D. KAVEDZAJUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Mutuma for the State.Mr. Ogutu for the applicant.Applicant present (VTC)