[2024] KECPT 248 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 248 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had sufficiently proved his membership and the total contributions made to both the predecessor and successor societies, as evidenced by AGM minutes and correspondence. The Respondent admitted owing the Claimant but failed to provide evidence justifying the deduction of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 248 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Silvanus Hasino Ogama; Respondent: Busia Teachers Education Investment Cooperative Society
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E014 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed in full
Judges
BM Kimemia, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies, Refund of Member Contributions, Termination of Membership, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Societies Refund of Member Contributions Termination of Membership Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Silvanus Hasino Ogama

Applicant

Busia Teachers Education Investment Cooperative Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of his total contributions upon termination of membership.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent was justified in deducting administrative costs from the Claimant's contributions.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant sufficiently proved the link between the predecessor and successor cooperative societies.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had sufficiently proved his membership and the total contributions made to both the predecessor and successor societies, as evidenced by AGM minutes and correspondence. The Respondent admitted owing the Claimant but failed to provide evidence justifying the deduction of administrative costs. The Tribunal held that the Claimant was entitled to a full refund of Kshs. 208,500, as the Respondent did not adduce any evidence to support the deduction of Kshs. 7,000 as administrative costs. The Tribunal also awarded costs and interest at Tribunal rates to the Claimant.

Court Disposition

claim allowed in full

Orders

  • The Respondent shall refund the Claimant Kshs. 208,500.
  • The Respondent shall pay costs and interest at Tribunal rates.