[2024] KEHC 4915 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 4915 (KLR)

The court found that the Taxing Master erred in principle by failing to call for and avail the principal file for verification of the items in the Bill of Costs. This omission rendered the taxation process fundamentally flawed, as there was no basis for the Taxing Master to verify the legitimacy of the costs...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 4915 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ogejo, Omboto & Kijala Advocates, LLP; Respondent: United Millers Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E087 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Certificate of Costs
Outcome
Application struck out; taxation and certificate of costs set aside; bill remitted for fresh taxation.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Bill of Costs, Remission to Taxing Master
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Bill of Costs Remission to Taxing Master

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ogejo, Omboto & Kijala Advocates, LLP

Applicant

United Millers Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Certificate of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the taxation of the Bill of Costs was conducted in accordance with the required legal principles.
  2. 2 Whether the principal file was availed to the Taxing Master for verification of the Bill of Costs items.
  3. 3 Whether the application dated 7th May 2024 should be considered on its merits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Taxing Master erred in principle by failing to call for and avail the principal file for verification of the items in the Bill of Costs. This omission rendered the taxation process fundamentally flawed, as there was no basis for the Taxing Master to verify the legitimacy of the costs claimed. Consequently, the court declined to consider the application dated 7th May 2024 on its merits, struck it out, set aside the taxation ruling and certificate of costs dated 11th April 2024, and remitted the Bill of Costs back to the Taxing Master for taxation interpartes, with directions to address the procedural pitfalls identified in the ruling.

Court Disposition

Application struck out; taxation and certificate of costs set aside; bill remitted for fresh taxation.

Orders

  • The application dated 7th May 2024 is struck out.
  • The taxation ruling and certificate of costs dated 11th April 2024 are set aside.