[2024] KEHC 5128 (KLR)
The court found that the unsigned handwritten ruling on taxation dated 1st February 2024 did not constitute a valid decision by the Taxing Master. Consequently, the certificate of costs issued pursuant to that ruling was invalid and incapable of being adopted as a judgment of the court. Furthermore, the court noted...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 5128 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ogejo, Omboto & Kijala Advocates, Llp; Respondent: United Millers Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E091 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment
- Outcome
- application struck out; certificate of costs and related proceedings quashed; matter remitted for fresh taxation
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Costs, Adoption of Costs as Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ogejo, Omboto & Kijala Advocates, Llp
Applicant
United Millers Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Adopt Certificate of Costs as Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the unsigned handwritten ruling on taxation constitutes a valid decision for purposes of issuing a certificate of costs.
- 2 Whether the certificate of costs dated 1st February 2024 can be adopted as a judgment of the court.
- 3 Whether the bill of costs was properly taxed without reference to the principal file.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the unsigned handwritten ruling on taxation dated 1st February 2024 did not constitute a valid decision by the Taxing Master. Consequently, the certificate of costs issued pursuant to that ruling was invalid and incapable of being adopted as a judgment of the court. Furthermore, the court noted that the bill of costs was taxed without reference to the principal file, raising concerns about the verification of services and disbursements. The court held that it could not accept or adopt such mechanically conducted judicial proceedings. As a result, the application for adoption of the certificate of costs was struck out, the proceedings leading to the issuance of the...
Court Disposition
application struck out; certificate of costs and related proceedings quashed; matter remitted for fresh taxation
Orders
- The application dated 7th May 2024 is struck out.
- The proceedings leading to the issuance of the certificate of costs dated 1st February 2024 are set aside and quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
Ogejo, Omboto & Kijala Advocates, Llp v United Millers Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application E091 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 5128 (KLR) (9 May 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 5128 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Civil Application E091 of 2023
RE Aburili, J
May 9, 2024
Between
Ogejo, Omboto & Kijala Advocates, Llp
Applicant
and
United Millers Limited
Respondent
(Arising from the professional services rendered by the Applicant to the Respondent in the original Kisumu HC Misc. Civil Application No. 121 of 2020)
Ruling
1. This matter came up for an application dated 7th May 2024 under certificate of urgency.
2. I decline to certify it as urgent but called upon the Applicant’s counsel Mr. Okwemba did appear.
3. The court pointed out that the application for adoption of the certificate of costs dated 1st February 2024 could not be accepted by the court and the certificate converted as judgment of the court because there were various issues.
4. First, is that the Ruling on taxation which is handwritten dated 1st February 2024 and with no typed and signed Ruling was never signed by the Taxing Master thereby rendering it no decision at all such that the certificate of costs that followed is of no consequence and is incapable of being adopted by this court as judgment of the court.
5. Second, is that the bill of costs dated 31st May 2023 with 82 items was taxed without any reference being made to the principal file Kisumu HC Misc. Civil Application No. 121 of 2020.
6. The court therefore wonders where the Taxing Master verified the items of services rendered or disbursements from for her to award to the applicant advocate, even if the Bill was not opposed.
7. This court cannot, as a court of record, accept mechanical judicial proceedings conducted by the taxing master and adopt such proceedings as being valid.
8. Accordingly, I hereby decline to consider the application dated 7th May 2024 on merit. I strike it out as it is not anchored on valid authenticated orders.
9. I set aside and quash the proceedings leading to the issuance of certificate of costs dated 1st February 2024 and set aside that certificate of costs.
10. I remit the file to the Deputy Registrar of this court/Taxing Master to retax the bill afresh, taking into account the concerns raised in this Ruling.
11. Mention on 6th June 2024 before Deputy Registrar.
12. Ruling to be typed and uploaded on the CTS.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kisumu this 9th Day of May, 2024R. E. ABURILIJUDGEPage 3 of 3