[2018] KEHC 472 (KLR)
The High Court determined that it does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals arising from disputes between employers and employees, particularly those involving workplace injuries and the duty of care owed by an employer. This is because Article 169(2) of the Constitution and section 12(1) of the Employment and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 472 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Ogembo Tea Factory; Respondent: John Makori Maswari
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 74 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal transferred for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Elrc, Employer Duty of Care, Workplace Injury, Transfer of Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ogembo Tea Factory
Appellant
John Makori Maswari
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal involving an employer-employee dispute concerning workplace injury.
- 2 Whether the matter should be heard by the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC).
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that it does not have jurisdiction to hear appeals arising from disputes between employers and employees, particularly those involving workplace injuries and the duty of care owed by an employer. This is because Article 169(2) of the Constitution and section 12(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, 2011, confer exclusive jurisdiction over such matters to the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC). The Supreme Court decision in Republic vs Karisa Chengo & Others [2017] eKLR clarified that the High Court, ELRC, and Environment and Land Court are distinct and autonomous courts, each with its own jurisdiction. Consequently, the High Court cannot...
Court Disposition
Appeal transferred for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Proceedings dated 15th October 2018 are set aside.
- The matter is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu for hearing and determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CIVIL APPEAL NO.74 OF 2012
OGEMBO TEA FACTORY......................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
JOHN MAKORI MASWARI................................RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal from the judgment and Decree of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court in Ogembo Civil Suit No.75 of 2010 delivered on 4/5/2012)
RULING
1. I have considered the pleadings in the respondent’s suit in the lower court CMCC No. 75 of 2010. The respondent at paragraph 3 of his plaint avers that he was employed by the defendant/appellant as a general worker. He avers that it was a term of the said contract of employment and or it was the duty of the defendant to take all reasonable precautions for the safety of the plaintiff while he was engaged upon his work not to expose the plaintiff to risk of injury which the defendant knew or ought to have known to provide and maintain adequate and suitable measures for the safety of the plaintiff and to provide and maintain a safe system of work. The claim is over the contract the respondent had with the appellant and injuries sustained whilst in the said employment. In my view this court (High Court) lacks the jurisdiction to determine the issues raised on the duty of care of the employer and alleged injuries whilst within the employment of the appellant.
2. Under Article 169(2) of the Constitution as read with section 12(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2011, the ELRC has exclusive jurisdiction to hear appeals from court and tribunals on labour and employment disputes. The issue of jurisdiction of the ELRC vis-à-vis the High Court in relation to disputes between employer and employee was dealt with by the Supreme Court in Republic vs Karisa Chengo& Others, Supreme CourtPetition No. 5 of 2015 [2017]eKLR where it held as follows:
[52] From a reading of the Constitution and these Acts of Parliament, it is clear that a special cadre of courts, with sui generis jurisdiction, is provided for. We therefore entirely concur with the Court of Appeal’s decision that such parity of hierarchical stature does not imply that either Environment and Land Court or Employment and Labour Relations Court is the High Court or vice versa. The three are different and autonomous courts and exercise different and distinct jurisdictions. As Article 165(5) precludes the High Court from entertaining matters reserved to the Environment and Land Court and Employment and Labour Relations Court, it should, by the same token, be inferred that the Environment and Land Court and Employment and Labour Relations Court too cannot hear matters reserved to the jurisdiction of the High Court.
This court therefore lacks the jurisdiction to determine this appeal. I set aside my proceedings dated the 15th October 2018 and transfer the matter to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu for hearing and determination.
Dated signed and delivered this 19th day of December 2018
R.E.OUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of;
Mr. Orina For the Appellant
Mr. Nyangosi For the Respondent
Ms. Rael Court/Clerk