[2025] KEELC 5060 (KLR)
The court found that the application dated 24/09/2024 sought orders substantially similar to those in an earlier application dated 05/02/2024, which was already partly heard and pending determination. Entertaining the present application would result in duplicative proceedings and procedural confusion. In the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 5060 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Christopher Amol Ogembo; Respondent: The District Land Adjucation & Settlement Suba/Mbita Districts; Respondent: The Director of Land Adjudication; Respondent: The District Land Registrar Homa-Bay/Suba/Mbita; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General; Respondent: Josephat Omondi Juma (Sued as the Legal Administrators of the Estate of John Juma Osore)
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Petition 4 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Petition / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Compel Registration of Mutation and Issuance of Title Deeds
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Judges
- FO Nyagaka
- Legal Topics
- Land Adjudication, Title Deeds, Mutation Registration, Court Orders Enforcement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Amol Ogembo
Applicant
The District Land Adjucation & Settlement Suba/Mbita Districts
Respondent
The Director of Land Adjudication
Respondent
The District Land Registrar Homa-Bay/Suba/Mbita
Respondent
The Honourable Attorney General
Respondent
Josephat Omondi Juma (Sued as the Legal Administrators of the Estate of John Juma Osore)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Petition / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Compel Registration of Mutation and Issuance of Title Deeds
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should compel the Land Registrar to register the mutation and issue title deeds despite non-surrender of the original title deed by the respondents.
- 2 Whether the current application should proceed given the existence of a similar, earlier application that is partly heard.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application dated 24/09/2024 sought orders substantially similar to those in an earlier application dated 05/02/2024, which was already partly heard and pending determination. Entertaining the present application would result in duplicative proceedings and procedural confusion. In the interest of justice and proper case management, the court struck out the later application to allow the earlier one to be concluded. The court declined to address the substantive merits of the application regarding the registration of the mutation and issuance of title deeds, as the matter was already before the court in the earlier application.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 24/09/2024 is struck out for similarity with the application dated 05/02/2024.
- Each party shall bear its own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Ogembo v District Land Adjucation & Settlement Suba/Mbita Districts & 4 others (Environment & Land Petition 4 of 2022) [2025] KEELC 5060 (KLR) (18 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 5060 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Environment & Land Petition 4 of 2022
FO Nyagaka, J
June 18, 2025
Between
Christopher Amol Ogembo
Applicant
and
The District Land Adjucation & Settlement Suba/Mbita Districts
1st Respondent
The Director of Land Adjudication
2nd Respondent
The District Land Registrar Homa-Bay/Suba/Mbita
3rd Respondent
The Honourable Attiorney General
4th Respondent
Josephat Omondi Juma (Sued as the Legal Administrators of the Estate of John Juma Osore)
5th Respondent
Ruling
1. By way of Notice of Motion dated 24/09/2024, the Applicant seeks the following orders;1. Spent2. The Honourable Court be pleased to Order and/or Direct the Land Registrar, Homa-Bay County to dispense with the surrender of the Original Title Deed over and in respect of LR NO. Lambwe EST/Lambwe West ‘B’/217 and forthwith register the Mutation in respect of same to pave way for the transfer and registration of the resultant portions to and/or in favour of the family of Norbert Ogembo Ongus, now Deceased represented by the Petitioner/Applicant and the family of John Juma Osore, now Deceased represented by the 5th and 6th Respondents herein in terms of the Judgment of the Court and more particularly, the Amended Decree of the Honourable Court made on the 26th day of July 2022. 3.The Honourable Court be pleased to Order and/or Direct the Land Registrar, Homa-Bay County to forthwith register the Transfer Instruments and issue title deeds over and in respect of LR NO. Lambwe EST/Lambwe West ‘B’/217 and forthwith register the Mutation in respect of same to pave way for the transfer and registration of the resultant portions to and/or in favour of the family of Norbert Ogembo Ongus, now Deceased represented by the Petitioner/Applicant and the family of John Juma Osore, now Deceased represented by the 5th and 6th Respondents herein in terms of the Judgment of the Court and more particularly, the Amended Decree of the Honourable Court made on the 26th day of July 2022. 4.Costs of this Application be borne by the 5th and 6th Respondents.5. Such further and/or other orders be made as the court may deem fit and expedient.
2. The Application is premised on the grounds on the face of it and the contents of the supporting affidavit sworn by the Applicant. In the affidavit, the Applicant contends that subsequent to the filing of the petition herein, the court rendered judgement and issued an Amended decree on 26/07/2022. The consequence of the same was that 12 acres were awarded to the family of John Juma Osore, represented by the 5th and 6th Respondents and the remainder to the family of Norbert Ogembo Ongus represented by the Petitioner.
3. The Applicants’ case is that the parties have been unable to register the mutation due to the failure of the 5th and 6th Respondents to surrender the original title deed. The Applicant seeks to have the court compel the land registrar to register the requisite mutation and issue the title deed for the decreed portion, the non-surrender of the original title deed notwithstanding.
4. I note that in the court record there was an Application dated 05/02/2024 where the Applicant sought the following orders;1. Spent2. The Honourable Court be pleased to order and/or direct the Honourable Deputy Registrar herein, to execute the Mutation. Application for Consent of Land Control Board, together with the Transfer Instrument(s) over and in respect of LR NO. Lambwe West/Lambwe West ‘B'/217, respectively, to facilitate the sub-division, transfer and registration of the resultant parcels to and/or in favour of the family of Norbert Ogembo Ongus, now Deceased represented by the Petitioner/Applicant and the family of John Juma Osore now Deceased represented by the 5th and 6th Respondents herein in terms of the Judgment of the Court and more particularly, the Amended Decree of the Honourable Court made on the 26th day of July 2022. 3.The Honourable Court be pleased to grant such further and/or other orders, as may be just and/or expedient to enable the Petitioner/Applicant and the 5th and 6th Respondents herein, to partake and/or benefit from the Judgment of this Honourable Court and the resultant Amended Decree made on the 26th day of July 2022. 4.Costs of this Application be provided for.
5. The Application came before this court for hearing as it was. But before it proceeded for hearing the court issued Summons to the 5th and 6th Respondents to come court to explain the need for the surrender of the title willingly. Unfortunately, the 5th Respondent passed away and the present Application was filed before the former had been determined.
6. Both of the Applications seek similar orders. The only difference is that the second Application seeks to have titles issued and the mutation registered notwithstanding the failure of the Respondents to surrender the original title deed. The earlier application was partly heard. It should have either been heard fully or determined or withdrawn. Otherwise as things are this application ought to have been stayed pending the hearing of the previous one. But in the interest of justice, since the two applications are similar and in the same file, and they cannot proceed simultaneously and or that the instant one or previous one has not been withdrawn, this one ought to give way for the part heard one.
7. The upshot of the foregoing is that the Application dated 24/09/2024 is hereby struck out for similarity with the one dated 05/02/2024.
8. Each party shall bear its own costs.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA THE TEAMS PLATFORM THIS 18THDAY OF JUNE 2025HON. DR. IUR FRED NYAGAKA,JUDGEMulisa for the Applicant.No Appearance for the Respondent