[2024] KEELC 1469 (KLR)
The court determined that, since both parties through their respective counsel agreed to compromise the application for a temporary injunction by consent, it was appropriate to adopt the terms proposed and affirmed by both sides. Guided by the constitutional imperative to promote alternative dispute resolution and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 1469 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Casmie Mbori Ogendi alias Casmiel Mbori Ogendi; Defendant: Fredrick Onyango Odhiambo (Sued on her Own Behalf and as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Johnson Odhiambo Ogolo -Deceased)
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E002 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction
- Outcome
- Application determined by consent; status quo maintained; plaintiff to remain in possession; no further dealings with the property pending suit determination; costs in the cause.
- Judges
- GMA Ongondo
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Injunctive Relief, Limitation of Actions, Land Registration, Status Quo Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Casmie Mbori Ogendi alias Casmiel Mbori Ogendi
Plaintiff
Fredrick Onyango Odhiambo (Sued on her Own Behalf and as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Johnson Odhiambo Ogolo -Deceased)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the suit property pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the status quo should be maintained regarding possession and occupation of the suit property.
- 3 Whether the application can be determined by consent of the parties.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that, since both parties through their respective counsel agreed to compromise the application for a temporary injunction by consent, it was appropriate to adopt the terms proposed and affirmed by both sides. Guided by the constitutional imperative to promote alternative dispute resolution and the statutory powers of the Environment and Land Court to grant interim orders, the court ordered that the plaintiff shall continue in possession and occupation of the suit property, and that there shall be no fresh development, sale, disposal, transfer, or charge of the property pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. The application was thus determined by...
Court Disposition
Application determined by consent; status quo maintained; plaintiff to remain in possession; no further dealings with the property pending suit determination; costs in the cause.
Orders
- The notice of motion application dated 1st February 2024 is determined by consent of parties.
- The plaintiff to continue in possession and occupation of the suit property and there shall be no fresh development, sale, disposal, transfer, or charge of the same pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Ogendi v Odhiambo (Sued on her Own Behalf and as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Johnson Odhiambo Ogolo -Deceased) (Environment & Land Case E002 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 1469 (KLR) (14 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 1469 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Environment & Land Case E002 of 2024
GMA Ongondo, J
March 14, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT, CHAPTER 22 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF: SECTIONS 37 AND 38 OF THE LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF; CLAIM FOR ADVERSE POSSESSION/PRESCRIPTION AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 28 OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT, NO 3 OF 2012 AND IN THE MATTER OF LR NO. KADEM MUHURU BAY/635
Between
Casmie Mbori Ogendi alias Casmiel Mbori Ogendi
Plaintiff
and
Fredrick Onyango Odhiambo (Sued on her Own Behalf and as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Johnson Odhiambo Ogolo -Deceased)
Defendant
Ruling
1. By a Notice of Motion application dated 1st February 2024, the plaintiff/applicant through Oguttu Mboya, Ochwal and Partners Advocates is seeking the Principal orders infra;a.The Honourable Court be pleased to grant an order of temporary injunction restraining the Defendant/Respondent herein either by herself, agents, servants, employees and/or anyone claiming under the Defendant/Respondent, from entering onto, Encroaching upon, selling and/or disposing of, charging, leasing, trespassing onto, ploughing, cultivating and/or otherwise interfering with, threatening to forcibly enter upon, fencing and/or in any other manner dealing with the suit property that is, LR No. West Kasipul/Kodera Kamiyawa/410 and/or any portion thereof, pending the hearing and determination of the suit.b.In the alternative and without rejudice to the foregoing, the Honourable Court be pleased to order and/or direct the Maintenance of Status Quo in respect of, LR No. West Kasipul/Kodera/Kamiyawa/410 and more particularly, barring and/or prohibiting the defendant/Respondent from entering upon, encroaching upon, selling and/or disposing of, charging, leasing, trespassing onto, ploughing, cultivating and/or otherwise interfering with, threatening to forcibly enter upon, fencing and/or in any other manner dealing with the suit property that is, LR No. West Kasipul/Kodera Kamiyawa/410 and/or any Portion thereof, pending the hearing and determination of this suit.c.Costs of this Application be borne by the Defendant/Respondent.
2. Learned counsel W. Ochwal of Oguttu Mboya, Ohwal and Partners Advocates for the applicant has proposed that the application be compromised on terms.
3. Mr Omuthe, learned counsel for the defendant/respondent has affirmed the proposal by the plaintiff/applicant’s counsel.
4. In light of the affirmed proposal by counsel for the respective parties and being guided by Article 159 (2) (c) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, the Court of Appeal decision in Ogada v Mollin [2009] KLR 620, section 13 (7) (a) of the ELC Act, 2015 (2011) and in the interest of justice, it is hereby ordered and directed that;a.The notice of motion application dated 1st February 2023 is hereby determined by consent of parties.b.So, the plaintiff to continue in possession and occupation of the suit property herein and there be no fresh development or sell, disposal in any manner including transfer or charge of the same pending the hearing and determination of this suit.c.Costs of the application be in the cause.
5. It is so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT HOMA-BAY THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2024. G.M.A ONG’ONDOJUDGEPresent1. W. Ochwal learned counsel for the plaintiff/applicant2. Omuthe learned counsel for the defendant/applicant3. T. Luanga, court assistant