[2023] KEELC 461 (KLR)
The court found that the appellants failed to comply with its orders to file the record of appeal, despite being given adequate opportunity and notice. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural timelines and court directions to ensure the expeditious administration of justice, as mandated by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 461 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Wilkista Awino Ogola; Appellant: Emily Adoyo; Respondent: Sebastian Nengoh Aketch
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E004 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- GMA Ongondo
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Non Compliance, Record of Appeal, Appellate Jurisdiction, Court Orders, Timeliness of Appeals
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilkista Awino Ogola
Appellant
Emily Adoyo
Appellant
Sebastian Nengoh Aketch
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for failure to file the record of appeal as ordered by the court.
- 2 Whether the appellants complied with the court's directions regarding the prosecution of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellants failed to comply with its orders to file the record of appeal, despite being given adequate opportunity and notice. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural timelines and court directions to ensure the expeditious administration of justice, as mandated by the Constitution and relevant statutes. The failure to prosecute the appeal and comply with mandatory procedural steps justified the dismissal of the appeal. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal with costs to the respondent, reinforcing the principle that justice should not be delayed by non-compliance or inaction by parties.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The appeal is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
Ogola & another v Aketch (Environment and Land Appeal E004 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 461 (KLR) (7 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 461 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Environment and Land Appeal E004 of 2021
GMA Ongondo, J
February 7, 2023
Between
Wilkista Awino Ogola
1st Appellant
Emily Adoyo
2nd Appellant
and
Sebastian Nengoh Aketch
Respondent
(Being an appeal from the Judgment of the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Homa-Bay, written by the Honourable Learned Trial Magistrate, A.T. Obutu and delivered on 22nd September, 2021, by the Honourable Learned Trial Magistrate in Environment and land Suit No. E003 OF 2020)
Ruling
1. This ruling is in regard to an application by Quinter Adoyo, learned counsel for the Respondent, Sebastian Nengoh Akech for dismissal of this appeal with costs to the respondent in the interest of justice.
2. The appeal was filed 30th September 2021 by way of a memorandum of appeal dated 24th September 2021 by the two appellants through the firm of Obach and partners Advocates anchored on eight grounds, inter alia;a.That the leaned trial magistrate erred in Law in failing to consider that the Hon. Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit as it had been filed out of time and was therefore time barred.b.That the learned trial magistrate erred when he failed to find that the Respondent had failed its obligations under the contract hence the termination.
3. Wherefore, the appellant prays for orders as follows.a.That the appeal be allowed.b.That the Judgment of learned trial magistrate dated 22nd day of September, 2021 be quashed and/or set aside and the same be substituted with an order allowing the appellant’s defence in lieu of the reliefs sought in Homa-Bay Chief Magistrate’s Court Environment and Land Case No. E003 of 2020. c.That the costs of this Appeal and in the subordinate court be awarded to the Appellants.
4. It is the assertion of the respondent’s counsel that the appellant has not filed a record of appeal. That he has not complied with the orders of this honourable court.
5. I bear in mind the proceedings of 24th October 2022 herein. Indeed, the appellant has neglected to file record of appeal as per this court’s orders given on 12th February 2022 and 24th October 2022.
6. The respondent’s counsel was duly made aware of this appeal as disclosed in affidavit of service sworn on 11th November 2022 by the Respondent’s counsel; see Ogada versus Mollin (2009) KLR620.
7. Article 159(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 provides:“Justice shall not be delayed”
8. This court is guided by sections 3 and 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2015 (2011) as well as sections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act chapter 21 Laws of Kenya.
9. In the foregone, there is merit in the application by the respondent’s counsel.
10. Thus, this appeal, be and is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondent.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT HOMA-BAY THIS 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023. G.M.A ONG’ONDOJUDGEPresentQuinter Adoyo, learned counsel for respondentOkello, Court Assistant.