[2006] KEHC 653 (KLR)
The court held that the respondent's objection to the taxation was filed outside the 14-day period prescribed by paragraph 11(1) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, rendering the objection invalid. Since there was a valid certificate of taxation and no dispute as to retainer, Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 653 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ogonji & Tiego Advocates; Respondent: Samuel Kinyua Mutugi; Respondent: Standard Commercial Investigations Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 613 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs with interest and costs of the application.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Remuneration, Certificate of Taxation, Objection to Taxation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ogonji & Tiego Advocates
Applicant
Samuel Kinyua Mutugi
Respondent
Standard Commercial Investigations Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether the respondent's objection to taxation was filed within the prescribed period under the Advocates (Remuneration) Order.
- 3 Whether the absence of a dispute as to retainer entitles the applicant to judgment under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the respondent's objection to the taxation was filed outside the 14-day period prescribed by paragraph 11(1) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, rendering the objection invalid. Since there was a valid certificate of taxation and no dispute as to retainer, Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act entitled the applicant to judgment for the taxed costs. The court found no legal basis to withhold judgment and accordingly entered judgment for the applicant for the full taxed amount, together with interest from the date of taxation and costs of the application.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs with interest and costs of the application.
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant for Kshs.203,160/=.
- Interest awarded from 10th April, 2006 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Misc Civ Appli 613 of 2004
OGONJI & TIEGO ADVOCATES……………….........…………….APPLICANT
VERSUS
SAMUEL KINYUA MUTUGI ………………..........….……..1ST RESPONDENT
STANDARD COMMERCIAL INVESTIGATIONS LTD....2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
The advocate with bill of costs has filed a Notice of Motion dated 26th July, 2006. The application is brought under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act. The orders it seeks are for judgement to be entered for the taxed costs of Kshs.203,160/=. In the alternative the advocate seeks for judgement for Kshs.76,742/= which amount was conceded by the Respondent during taxation. The affidavit in support of the application the advocate confirms that a bill of costs was lodged and was taxed on 10th April, 2006. The taxed amount was Kshs.203,160/=. That at the time of taxation the Respondent conceded to costs of Kshs.76,742/=. That to date the Respondent has not paid either the taxed amount or the amount conceded during taxation. A certificate of taxation was issued by the taxing master and is dated 7th June, 2006. The Respondent opposed the application and the opposition was only on the basis that it has raised objection to the taxation which objection was filed on 15th May, 2006.
Under paragraph 11(1) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order when a party wishes to object to a decision of the taxing officer they should within 14 days after the decision give notice in writing to the taxing officer of the items of which they object to. The taxation in this matter as stated before was on 10th April, 2006. The objection filed by the Respondent although dated 24th April, 2006 was not filed in court until 15th May, 2006. That period is certainly out of the period envisaged by paragraph 11(1) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. Therefore, the only basis upon which the Respondent opposes the application being the objection raised the same being defeated by that paragraph it cannot stand against the prayers which are sought. The advocate has moved under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act. That section provides that a certificate of taxation unless it is set aside or altered by the court shall be the final amount of costs recoverable thereby. That section provides that the court can make such an order in relation to that certificate of taxation as it thinks fit, including in case where a retainer is not disputed, order that judgement be entered for the taxed costs. In this case there is a certificate of taxation signed by the taxing officer and there has not been any dispute in respect of retainer. In view of that the court finds that the advocate is entitled for judgement to be entered for the taxed amount. The court therefore, enters judgement in favour of the Applicant for Kshs.203,160/= together with interest from 10th April, 2006 until payment in full. The applicant is also granted costs of the Notice of Motion dated 26th July, 2006. Orders accordingly.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Dated and delivered this 19th day of December, 2006.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE