[2022] KEHC 16832 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16832 (KLR)

The court held that it lacks the mandate to further revise the sentence imposed on the applicant for the offence of murder, as the sentence was already lawfully pronounced under the relevant provisions of the Penal Code. The application for sentence review was therefore declined, and the file was ordered closed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16832 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samwel Aswan Ogot; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E120 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review
Outcome
application for sentence review declined
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Murder Offence, Penal Code Section 203 204
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Murder Offence Penal Code Section 203 204

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samwel Aswan Ogot

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to further revise the sentence imposed for murder under section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacks the mandate to further revise the sentence imposed on the applicant for the offence of murder, as the sentence was already lawfully pronounced under the relevant provisions of the Penal Code. The application for sentence review was therefore declined, and the file was ordered closed.

Court Disposition

application for sentence review declined

Orders

  • The revision of sentence is declined.
  • File closed.