[2023] KEELC 18369 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 18369 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs, having been duly notified of the hearing date, failed to take any step in the proceedings for over a year. Pursuant to Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. The absence of any action by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 18369 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Job Ouma Ogutu; Plaintiff: Julias Odhiambo Ogutu; Defendant: John Ooko Andele; Defendant: Coldori Enterprises Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 12 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the 2nd defendant.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Civil Procedure Rules, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Civil Procedure Rules Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Job Ouma Ogutu

Plaintiff

Julias Odhiambo Ogutu

Plaintiff

John Ooko Andele

Defendant

Coldori Enterprises Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs, having been duly notified of the hearing date, failed to take any step in the proceedings for over a year. Pursuant to Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. The absence of any action by the plaintiffs and the notification of the hearing date justified the dismissal with costs to the 2nd defendant.

Court Disposition

Suit dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the 2nd defendant.

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed with costs to the 2nd defendant pursuant to Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.