[2007] KEHC 2085 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2085 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's costs had been duly taxed at Kshs. 1,950,000 by the Taxing Master and a Certificate of Taxation issued. The respondent had not filed any reference or appeal against the taxation and did not dispute the retainer. The application was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 2085 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ogutu Wariuki & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Joint Liquidators-Ndumberi Farmers Co. Ltd (In Liquidation)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 193 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Enter Taxed Costs as Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed. Taxed costs entered as judgment. Applicant awarded costs of the application.
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Certificate of Taxation, Enforcement of Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Certificate of Taxation Enforcement of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ogutu Wariuki & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Joint Liquidators-Ndumberi Farmers Co. Ltd (In Liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Enter Taxed Costs as Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the taxed costs between advocate and client should be entered as judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's costs had been duly taxed at Kshs. 1,950,000 by the Taxing Master and a Certificate of Taxation issued. The respondent had not filed any reference or appeal against the taxation and did not dispute the retainer. The application was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that the applicant was entitled to have the taxed costs entered as judgment of the court. The court therefore allowed the application in terms of the prayers sought and awarded the applicant the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed. Taxed costs entered as judgment. Applicant awarded costs of the application.

Orders

  • The costs as taxed by the Taxing Master between client and advocate are entered as judgment of the court.
  • The applicant is awarded the costs of this application.